Iran will fund one side and Saudia Arabia will fund the other side. Saudia Arabia has already stated it would do this if the U.S. pulled out of Iraq. This means genocide. Basically, whoever has the best urban warfare tactics and the most warm bodies.
2007-01-11 21:45:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It does not look like Shias and Sunnis want to live together in one state. On the other hand, the Western powers and especially Turkey will not accept three independent states replacing the current failed state of Iraq. Also, there is a lot of oil that the Sunnis want a share of, despite it not being present in the areas where Sunnis live.
Therefore, in the near future, we are likely to see a democracy only by name, watching powerless over a civil war that will only extend and possibly affect some of the neighbouring countries. In the long run, anything is possible - but it is difficult to foresee any positive outcome.
2007-01-11 22:20:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by oec1 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'm no longer a muslim. yet in a pluralistic society like yours it may look which you recognize the ameliorations between yourselves. Then vote into regulation and implement it the reality that Sunni's that smash the regulation would be tried in front of a Sunni court abode. And and the comparable factor for Shai. And if a Sunni does harm to a Shai that there be a court run by applying a foreigner who does employer there. which will degree out justice. additionally bear in mind that for the time of accordance to the Bible the 1st international skill is the place Iraq is there now. And that become long earlier Islam. that's in basic terms too undesirable they can't in basic terms comprehend one yet another as brothers and attempt to get an prolonged. And in Daniel's time the Iraqi's have been one human beings that weren't afraid to allow foreigners to be in government. They reognized information while they observed it no rely if Iraqi or no longer. that's the way the society must be in a pluralistric society. you're top divide and triumph over is incorrect. that's the way of a corrupt government that seeks to serve itself and not the human beings. a real government could empower the human beings to regulate the government so as that justice would be meted out to all. And the excellent thank you to verify any form of justice is that the communities be accountalbe to their friends that are interior the comparable religious sect. via fact i actually do have faith interior the places of Iran and Iraq and interior of Sunni and Shai are a human beings that want peace and not conflict. That want desire and not melancholy. and those are the objectives that are uncomplicated to guy. sturdy good fortune.
2016-12-12 09:47:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is normally the case that a dictator takes control of a country, when that country is in war or just finished a war. For example Germany and Hitler. And it is also common that the minority takes over, as seen is Africa over and over again. However the USA does have a interests in Iraq and no doubt will not let this happen instead will want to setup a puppet-president. So it can have Iraq oil and a stepping block into the middle east.
2007-01-11 21:57:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tom S 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
No one faction will be able to. I see Iraq separating into 3 autonomous regions along tribal/ religious sectarian lines: Shias, Kurds and Sunnis. Iraq never was a nation in any real sense with out a strong man style of leader and internal police keeping minorities in check. Created from the ruins of the Ottoman Empire after WW I, like Yugoslavia, it has no strong sense of national identity. Similar to the former Soviet Union, without a strong government the ethnic and cultural differences will overcome any sense of national unity.
2007-01-11 22:21:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
America will not leave Iraq , so no chance of Democracy in Iraq in near future , same as in Afghanistan. Next, Shia or Sunny division of Muslim is to be remain helps America in control Iraq for Petroleum Products.
2007-01-11 21:52:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by deepaklbhatia 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
It's impossible to say.
As long as a republican is in the white house, the US will likely stay there, continue policing the new democracy, and the media will keep calling it a "war" even though it's not really big enough to be more than a policing of the country.
If a democrat is elected to the white house, we'll turn our back on them and cut and run like little screaming girls. The far left in the US will allow nothing less, and democrats are terrified of their constituents. They'll do anything the protesters and media tell them to do.
If we can train up enough Iraqi's to take care of themselves in 2 years, our own elections won't matter. They'll survive, we'll come home, and we'll have a new ally.
2007-01-11 21:43:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Both and the Iranian president will see to it too. the Arabs are hell bent on sticking together they think they have the chance for a world takeover. Somehow they think that they are blessed they hate Russia too but even though they are Russian collaborators. But something you should know, China just swore loyalty to Israel and they mean it too. After the 911 they took 6 arabs snatched them up and brought them outside in public and blew their brains out in public. I think the arabs are not going there too soon. And with China behind Israel I think the odds are evening up a little. And believe it or not we will need China to help the US. Bush is leaving the white house soon and his administration too, so we are going to have to have back up and the only enemy to trust is China lets face it they are all our enemies in a way, so we must pick the best of both evils and in this case I go with china, the rest will sell their mother and you and your children, chinese are a little too much into integrity, they make no bones about killing your butt if you cross them and I like that in them. Especially in war, plus China was the only one on our side in WWII and we helped them too. Mac Carthur. It was Truman that jerk who pulled him out, and the chinese suffered under Mao Tse Tung. China had no wealth for our cheap politicians, so we abandoned them and helped the enemy. Not us but the politicians. We decided to help Germany and Japan because of the heritage in Germany(banks, Lichtenstein, Luxemburg) and our government, and Japan was a case of profit. And what ever Euro people are on our side as well including the Russian territories. Whoever is for the freedom issues anywhere.
2007-01-11 21:57:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
well its very complex, but the war will never be over until the USA pulls out. Its not a war about arms or chemicals, its a holy war against the shiites and sunnys so when they realize that ALLAH is going to burn them in hell maybe thet will be more capable of understanding
2007-01-11 21:40:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
None of the above. It will be controlled by a Kurdish dictator because all of the Shiites, Sunnis, and Americans will be dead.
2007-01-12 00:53:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Joe L 1
·
0⤊
1⤋