who agrees with him this time? why are the american ppl so stupid and getting themselves killed for an OIL HUNGRY president? can no one see him for what he is? why are you supporting him? because hes got good public speaking skills? he doesnt give a damn about anything except power and money and that comes with OIL now hes after somalia because of the oil reserve found there and is blaming al qaeda in somalia? HOW RIDICULOUS WHY ARE YOU PPL BLIND?
2007-01-11 20:53:34 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
IM SORRY if i called the AMerican ppl stupid clearly they r not i just got a bit emotional
and all of u who r against me ur only going to realise when ur fathers, brothers, husbands boyfriends go out to fight POINTLESS WARS and get BUTCHERED for no reason through no fault of their own GO down to the fron line urself and see what it is really like WOULD BUSH OR BLAIR EVER SEND THEIR OWN CHILDREN THERE? theres ur answer...double standards hes fine to send the american people but if he really cared wouldnt he be at the front line HIMSELF?
2007-01-11 21:24:37 · update #1
no one agrees with Bush. 20 000 more will not end the "war" in Iraq...this is something that needs to be solved by the Iraqi people. They do not need anyone butting in. How would America or more importantly BUSH feel if some guy from Iraq came to Run his country (America) and sent his soldiers into America and started killing innocent civilians and humiliating a lot of prisoners. It would never happen!!!
All that will happen by Bush sending those 20 000 is more deaths!!! Just when election time comes along please vote for someone against BUSH!!!
2007-01-11 20:58:42 · answer #1 · answered by Uzlu2919 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Personally I do not think he is sending enough troops. Your contention about slaughter shows that you are disconnected from reality. 3000 soldiers in 3 years constitutes one of the most successful invasions from a casualty standpoint ever. If Bush is there to steal the oil where is it? No proof that even one drop stolen except in your delusion mind. You are further extremely clueless on Somalia. We have not attacked Somalia, we have bombed terrorist camps in support the government's own fight against terrorism. You know I don't call many people terrorist sympathizers, but you definitely fit the bill based on the fact that you cannot or will not recognize proper action against these animals. The only blind person I see here is you.
Uzlu2919: Not everyone disagrees with Bush. Kindly state your own opinions, but stop trying to speak for the rest us.
charlzy: Same answer as above. I am American and I do support the action. Speak for yourself and not for me or anyone else.
Dex: Semper Fi and thanks for your service to this great land of ours.
2007-01-11 21:06:19 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Ok retard.. Speaking in a Democratic mind I would say that sending more troops is a great idea. Bush f*cked up because he did not do this a year ago... Working within ' a democratic "we should get out of Iraq." You think you know it all but you do not! Democrats are now wanting to preserve soldiers, not let them die. That is why we agree to sending more troops to Iraq.
Do you remember winning the house and senate in 2006? Well yeah... That will tell you we have majority vote. That means we, in congress, voted to have more back up. Bush nly agrees at this time because he is too pathetic to agree that we should have put those soldiers there a year ago.
You fight against a cause that you think is democratic, but you have no pure democracy in you. They may call you Liberal though... That means you'd rather have the Iraqi army (and civilians) duke it out against our enemies.
2007-01-11 21:00:52 · answer #3 · answered by NONAME 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Its not that people arent opposed to it, its that people really cant do anything to stop it.
America seems to be divided on this issue, some support the war, some dont, the fact that either side does nothing is whats wrong.
Try and stop him, its next near impossible.
If you speak out against the war or other historical events you could be thrown in jail or labeled as a non-patriot or worse a terrorist.
Things will happen according to his delusional unrealistic view on reality and not one of us will be able to stop it.
Only when every major street in every major city is flooded with protesters will things change.
2007-01-11 21:04:27 · answer #4 · answered by MI6 W 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You are obviously a muslim....Me being an american and not a muslim i could ask your people the same things like WHY DO YOUR PEOPLE SUPPORT OSAMA???? HOW CAN YOU SUPPORT OSAMA??? your answer would most likely be i dont support him right?? well we support bush because he is our president he is the ruler of our country no matter how many bad decisions hes made at the end of the day he is still the president of my country and i nor can anyone who doesnt agree with him can change that......before referring to americans as stupid for supporting Bush referr to your kins first and see the type of people they support... thanks.
2007-01-12 06:27:26 · answer #5 · answered by Chet P 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
So according to you, and most democrats, Bush is the bad guy and the terrorists are good. After all, america cant win right, the soldiers must be as spineless as the writer of this question (who im sure has never fought for anything in his life). Give me a break, no wonder I vote Republican, Democrats are sissys. Id hardly call Iraq a slaughter, especially when compared to Nam/WW2/WW1
2007-01-11 21:08:15 · answer #6 · answered by Danny_in_LA 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
It is crazy, and worse still is that it's the porest Whites, African Americans and Hispanics who are always the cannon fodder for the wealthy few. While Cheney laughs all the way to his offshore acct. topped up to the tune of $1Billion in Iraq/Pentagon contracts, his kids will never see the hell hole that is Basra, much less Bush's daughters who spend their time flitting from party to party in Palm Beach. Why should the poor give their lives for the greed few? It is crazy and a major crime against humanity.
2007-01-11 21:09:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
i agree.bush is stupid.
i can draw a parrallel with stalingrad in 1942/43.
the germans kept feeding troops in and they kept getting slaughtered.this was hitlers fault of course.
i am disappointed the democrats can not make bush see reason.
2007-01-11 21:03:54 · answer #8 · answered by phelps 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because he wanted to give you an excellent excuse to insult Americans and call them stupid.
.
2007-01-11 21:07:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
i dont agree with him, i think its a total disgrace. i dont know how he is justifying it, he knows no americans want any more troops sent out there, i feel sorry for them. he is totally going against the wishes of the people who voted him in.......... i bet they are regretting it now. he needs to go, he is an idiot.
i hope blair isnt supporting him this time. things will just be made worse.
2007-01-11 21:05:48 · answer #10 · answered by Clart L 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋