English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...what penalties would you impose, on first-time 'offenders', through to repeat / multiple 'offenders'?

And how would the 'court of appeal' work? Would witnesses be called to provide 'evidence' on sound / duration / longevity - quality?

I just hope there would be no 'three strike rule', or that'd be the end for me!

2007-01-11 20:09:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

10 answers

Actually the use of such biological weapons is forbidden by the Geneva convetion. But then again since when does anyone respect the Geneva convention

2007-01-11 21:02:24 · answer #1 · answered by peter gunn 7 · 1 0

There was actually a case where someone got arrested for farting in public. I don't know what the penalties should be for that lol...just don't give anyone any ideas. We have too many dumb laws now as it. And yes pretty so we probably won't be able to fart either.. I was always told better out than in... Yea the smell is bad and sometimes it lingers awhile but it does go away.

2007-01-11 20:18:15 · answer #2 · answered by ?only?me? 6 · 2 0

It would all depend upon whether the act offended or disgusted anyone within a 10 foot radius. It also should go without saying "the silence but deadly" act created in 1975. This act declares that if anyone within that 10 foot radius had gagged, vomitted in any way, per say in the mouth, then legal action shall be imposed. The first offense shall be treated as a misdemeanor and then so on with the following offenses. They shall and will be treated as traffic violations without going against your driving record.

2007-01-12 11:04:13 · answer #3 · answered by antlog2 4 · 1 0

That is an incredibly ridiculous question but somewhat funny, but guess what bubba, you are arrested in some places for disturbing the peace if you are doing it to annoy and offend others and acting in a disorderly fashion. And this has happened before on an elevated train where a drunk was beligerent and nasty smelling to begin with and kept crevatating when the lady asked him to move and the cop arrested him. so thus there you go.

2007-01-11 20:19:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

you cannot be Guilty of farting as it's not you that is. But bacteria in your gut is the cause, and that is beyond your control. So no case to answer

2007-01-11 20:36:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

it's not a crime,but it should be an olympic sport,the variety of farts is endless,just think anyone could win a gold medal!!!But i think it should be a track and field sport(in a field far far away from the crowd)lol....

2007-01-11 20:17:22 · answer #6 · answered by mrgee32uk 2 · 3 0

I just wanted to say that not only is this funny as hell, it demonstrates how stupid and idiotic that some of the stuff that IS LEGISLATED really is!

2007-01-11 20:15:50 · answer #7 · answered by Los 2 · 4 0

If this were the case most of my family would be behind bars forever!!

2007-01-11 20:13:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Hell no.I'd be in big trouble to.I love to fart.

2007-01-11 20:18:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

why mot bottle it , then you could run your car on it and gordon brown could then tax you on it

2007-01-11 20:21:14 · answer #10 · answered by welshelf 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers