Uh......alright.
2007-01-11 19:47:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Docta Jones 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
I guess you mean the Titanic. She most likely could not have been built there to begin with. There were no shipyards in India at the time that could have built her.
What killed her, and the people was poor judgment, a proven bad captain, greed and a foolish disregard for safety. They forgot what the newspaper report said, she is ALMOST unsinkable. That one word, "almost" makes a huge difference. Her master, the captain was trying to set a speed record for the Atlantic crossing. If he had slowed down, just slowed down, he might very well have saved his ship. The Titanic was a doomed ship anyway. Her iron was a poor quality. It would have eventually fractured from heat strain anyway.
2007-01-12 04:10:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. At least it wouldn't have hit an iceberg on its maiden voyage
2. If it had sunk another 4000 souls would have been lost - 2000 odd in the cabins and another 2000 hanging off the roof, the railings, sleeping in the lifeboats, etc
3. The band would have been playing Bhangra as it went down
4. The Bollywood version of "Titanic" would have had a huge dance number going on as the ship broke in half
2007-01-12 04:24:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by the_lipsiot 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Most probably, it'll be made of wood instead of steel....heehe....no I'm just kidding. If Titanic was made in India, then the materials to make that ship would be a little low quality....at that time.
2007-01-12 03:53:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
TITANTIC? What if it was? It wasn't how the ship was built which destroyed it and killed the passengers. It was the iceberg and the lack of technology to see the iceberg in the water. Most people died from freezing in the water.
2007-01-12 03:47:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by DiVenanzo™ 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
What if....
What if you posted a question that made some sort of sense?
oh and it's T(i)tanic
not T(a)tanic
2007-01-12 04:20:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by CG-23 Sailor 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
tatanic or titanic?
assuming it's the cruise ship...
then i guess new york would be what london is today in those days - neo delhi (^_^)
2007-01-12 03:54:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Arez 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
well it sure as heck wouldn't hit a iceberg
2007-01-17 15:19:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by pnn177 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
titanic what titanic things in india.
2007-01-12 03:49:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by zyp_john 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
then it would be the TAITANEEK
2007-01-12 03:46:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dashes 6
·
2⤊
0⤋