English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

33 answers

It kinda depends on how old the person is. Once you get into your 20's, it's kinda creepy if you haven't had sex yet. But then, I don't think people should get married until at the earliest 25 so I guess I'd have to say go ahead and do the ol' bump and squirt.

2007-01-11 18:14:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

i don't have an issue both thanks to be honest i imagine on the present time is a own decision or perchance a decision made with information from what faith you're. i do not see something incorrect with sex earlier marriage as lengthy they are 2 consenting adults. the purely problem i do have is once you hear human beings having sex less than age. it truly is how they finally end up pregnant as they don't look emotionally mature adequate and don't have any existence journey.Teenage pregnancies is little ones having little ones.......yet between 2 adults its not an issue. on the different fringe of the coin I really have replied numerous questions the position human beings were ashamed as they have nonetheless been virgins. I really have suggested to them that's something to be happy with.

2016-12-02 03:57:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If you want to wait until you meet "the one" and you know that is the person you know you are going to spend the rest of your life with, then I would say you should get to know them completely to make sure they truly are "the one". The first time is awkward enough without putting more pressure on your wedding night. Get comfortable with your future spouse in every way possible and it will make your chances better at a lasting relationship.

As a poll, I would say, No, I would not advise no sex before marriage.

2007-01-11 18:14:15 · answer #3 · answered by Bee 1 · 0 1

I would advise no sex before maturity. I do not think 13 and 14 year olds should be having sex but at the same time, people should not be expected to be virgins on the wedding night at the age of 29. People cannot wait until 30 to first have sex. It is biologically unnatural. I am against promiscuity but I think people should not have to hinder their own natural desires and live in torture. Why should people go against their biology and how they were born and created? I say go for it as long as you have birth control and are prepared for taking care of a child. People that are 15 and going from guy to guy sicken me.

2007-01-11 18:13:41 · answer #4 · answered by prettyprincess 1 · 1 1

I believe that there should be no sex before married but who is perfect! Sometimes you just can not help yourself! But what do I know? Marriage is nothing but a piece of paper

2007-01-11 18:44:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Aye. I would advise it, just because it makes younger ones think about it more before they do it. Then again... I wouldn't expect them to go by it, just hold off a little longer. Who knows, they might find someone better before jumping into something.

2007-01-11 18:12:36 · answer #6 · answered by Jeannie 2 · 1 1

I wouldn't before marriage.

2007-01-11 18:09:18 · answer #7 · answered by lee-lee 1 · 0 1

sex before marriage is a must..do you want to spend 40 years with someone who doesn't turn you on sexually??

2007-01-11 18:07:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Have sex before you wed. What if he is bad in bed, doesn't please you and has a small dick. You will most likely end up having an affair which is bad. You would try on clothes before you bought them, wouldn't you? So just think of it as trying before your buying.

2007-01-11 18:10:03 · answer #9 · answered by biancajh 5 · 0 3

This may apply if you are religious but imagine if you married someone (for the rest of your life, as it is supposed to be) and they weren't any good!! Always try before you buy!!!!

2007-01-11 18:07:42 · answer #10 · answered by ChocLover 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers