2007-01-11 16:32:21 · 12 answers · asked by ibid 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
What new policy?
Sounds exactly like the old one to me.
2007-01-11 16:37:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Sure lets send more troops to die in Iraq, just as soon as Barbara and Jenna are trained, equipped and deployed to Iraq. If GW wants to send our childeren into harms way let him set the example. Bush's incompetence is overwhelmingly absurd, before we give him billions more to spend on a doomed attempt to save his legacy we should make him accountable for the billions of dollars that are not accounted for from both Iraq and Katrina. We have to stop his waste as our great grandchildren will be paying for his mistakes a hundred years ago. I also think that we should fuel up Airforce One and fly GW, Cheney, and Rumsfeld to the Haige for a nice little war crimes trial for torture and profiteering in the world court.
2007-01-12 01:10:39 · answer #2 · answered by Swede 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No hope and I see more people die in the Iraq war. Sorry and Please help me call and write the White House,Congress and Senator to stop the wrong decision in my opinion. I do not have any family in the army but my heart and soul feel for the Iraq people and our troops and families.
2007-01-16 00:36:37 · answer #3 · answered by ryladie99 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah I agree there is nothing new to what Bush offer
is just continuation of oil war.
he ignore the Generals in the field
he ignore the Iraq study group
he ignore the America people
and now his going to ignore the congress
basically he ignore everyone disagree with him
more that a president for me is look like
a crazy patient escape from a mental hospital.
2007-01-12 00:40:14 · answer #4 · answered by Arizona A 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I don't think it will work and the Prime minister of Iraq is full of crap. He is neither fish nor fowl and is led by the nose by all parties involved including Iran and Syria. Hey, man. They are all Arabs!
2007-01-12 02:07:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It was basically a preamble to the war on Iran. He knows his legacy in Iraq is in the toilet, so he wants his legacy as the President who took out Iran's nuclear capability.
2007-01-12 00:54:19 · answer #6 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
We should have had more troops and a plan from the beginning. We either should get out and suffer the consequences or try to win. We should not have been there in the first place. We are there, let's do what it takes to win.
2007-01-12 00:55:47 · answer #7 · answered by Jeppe 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Way to go President Bush. You are the man. We are so lucky to have you in the White House as opposed to one of those wimpy liberals. I like a man that can think for himself and not cater to what everyone else wants. This country was much better off when people did the right thing like he has tried to do since day one, instead of this political correctness crap that has tried to destroy our country and what it stands for and the pricipals it was founded on. Political correctness and the wussification of the people is what is wrong with this country and the reason it will fall if we don't wise up and go back to being people that have a backbone and the guts to do what is right regardelss of what others think.
2007-01-12 00:44:22 · answer #8 · answered by Wilkow Conservative 3 · 0⤊ 6⤋
I'm amazed that he can say "mistakes were made" and see 3000 dead, then turn around and get ready to repeat the mistakes by threatening Iran.
He is horrifyingly dangerous and getting more so.
2007-01-12 00:53:01 · answer #9 · answered by tranquility_base3@yahoo.com 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He got the new fall guy set up, Maliki. If all hell break lose he'll blame Maliki and run home. And there's your legacy insurance.
2007-01-12 02:24:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋