It seems to be that democrats only think its of their concern if we can just throw money at it like Africa or adopt it's children like Angelina adopted Maddox from Cambodia and Zahara from Ethiopia... lets not forget Madona's illegal adoption of David Banda from Malawi.
But, GOD FORBID!, republicans want to get their hands dirty by getting rid of a country's murderous dictator and his followers that like to kill their own people in the name of god.
It seems to go to far for liberals. "oh we can't through money at it to make it go away? Well then we'll just have to pretend it doesn't exist and its bad to get into other country's affairs."
2007-01-11 15:25:58 · 17 answers · asked by TJ815 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I agree. Liberals consistently refuse to look at the bigger picture. They are only concerned about themselves, their rights, and their own lack of income.
2007-01-11 15:47:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Are you really so foolish to believe that this is about getting rid of a murderous dictator? Following that logic we have a lot more places to take care of. Several of which are in Africa by the way. I wish it was the Republicans getting their hands dirty but unfortunately it is our sons and daughters fighting a war that was sold on the fact that we were facing weapons of mass destruction pointed at us while North Korea and Iran really are developing them. Stop making this a partisan issue and try some common sense. This Republican president has wasted more money in his tenure than any other president in History and we have the deficit to prove it. Are you an American or a Republican first? If you think its a good thing for everyone to have the same opinion of things then you are as bright as our current president.
2007-01-11 15:38:38 · answer #2 · answered by sshaner892000 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If you think George Bush Or Dick Cheney give a humanitarian Damn for Iraq or Iraqi's you are either completely deluded or easily sold a load of BULL SH*T!!!
This has been building and planned for YEARS!!
George Bush was being groomed for the presidency since the 80's.
Don't forget Dick Cheney was George Bush Sr.'s Sec. of Defense!
Is it really such a stretch of the imagination to think that this administration was manipulated into office?
Look back over the last 6 years. Forida's hanging chad debacle
a Bush state?! Election fuddling?!
If you want something bad enough you have to be willing to do whatever it takes to manufacture your position....that's what I have learned from the Bush administration!!
Win at all costs! Sadly, Americans have let them get away with it!
I know seeing the bigger picture is difficult....but it's necessary.
I am not willing to jeapordize my liberties to advance BushCo.'s mission.
Americans need to open their eyes to the truth about the motivation of this administration in Iraq!!!
2007-01-11 16:15:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well I think to the Democrats it means it to bring financial aid, humanitarian assistance, and partnership policies in aid of another country. All of which do cost money. I think the Republicans want these same things as well but are also more qualified to protect the USA.
That is just what I think about the two parties. Neither is better than the other as far as that goes to me. Vote for who you think will do a good job and not because of the political party label.
2007-01-11 15:42:17 · answer #4 · answered by J.C. 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
what's funny is how Republicans turn into bleeding hearts in Iraq...
while China, Darfur, N. Korea, Saudi Arabia kill millions... and hardly ever a word...
heck, you didn't even go into Iraq until about 15 years after Saddams major genocides were over...
not enough oil in those other countries maybe? I don't know?
2007-01-11 16:18:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sending jobs overseas. Giving CEOs two hundred million dollar annual salaries for sending jobs overseas. Raising the China trade deficit to new highs. Taking out enemies for Iran.
Oh. I'm sorry. I thought you said republicans...
2007-01-11 15:39:13 · answer #6 · answered by True Grit 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Listen up.
Im a democrat and i say doing either is just STUPID. Stop giving money to Iraq and stop giving money to Africa. FIX America first.
BTW, ive been to Iraq 2 times since this crap started. Yourself?
2007-01-11 15:34:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Your talking about people spending there own money on adopting and charities!!! So maybe a theory of taxing them more so they have less to spend of their own money. Now that would be against the republican formum of less taxes!!
You want have your cake and eat it too.
2007-01-11 15:40:15 · answer #8 · answered by wondermom 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think you are comparing apples and oranges here!!!repugs getting there hands dirty???how can you compare adopting a child and going to war and wasting billions of dollars on a never ending war?and now are you suggesting that we go to war with every nation that the US doesnt agree with?why not go to war with china because they have a bad record of human rights abuses.and btw we have throwen money at iraq in its still there!!!!
2007-01-11 15:36:12 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nine Billion Dollars---where's your argument for the missing money?
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/01/30/iraq.audit/
Justify such a chunk of change disappearing under your Hero's watch--c'mon--What no liberal to blame there?
We start talking dollars and cents minus rhetoric and your argument becomes very shallow.
http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1071
2007-01-11 15:40:14 · answer #10 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋