First, you cannot be a Joker and yet pose such serious questions :)
Let us go to how the war began. It started by selling lies to us that Saddam has WMD's. Those were never found. Then if you follow the media news over last 4 years, you will see that the face of the enemy was changed every 2-3 months. For a few days it was WMD's, then Saddam, then his Sons, then Abu-Musab something, then Muqtada Al-Sadr, then elections, then stability, then democracy etc etc and now sectarian voilence ....each face of the enemy suggesting that once this is over everything is going to be normal. These faces given to the enemy are nothing but to hijack the minds of the public, to divert from the fact that NOT A SINGLE IRAQI wants America there. We should just put in our minds and think where do these so called "terrorists" enter into Iraq from? They are born everyday within Iraq. What would a single person whose whole family is killed in a raid and he/she is left alone do? God forbid, if I were that person, I will become a suicide bomber and kill a few soldiers who were responsible for the raid. This has what been happenning since the war started. The war killed more innocent Iraqi's in 4 years than what 10 Saddams would have killed in 50 years. There may be a few days of chaos in Iraq if the war stopped suddenly, but then it is anyway chaos now. The difference being, the former chaos will end sooner or later, but the latter one is never ending. I will be very happy for the lives saved atleast now if the war stopped suddenly.
2007-01-11 15:32:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Phil 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
After observing a coach called Battlefield Breakdown the position troops, senior protection pressure adult adult males, and authorities officials were conversing about the themes in Iraq, the body of ideas of the pentagon, the shortcoming of teaching and kit, being thrust into circumstances they were not educated to finish and how issues are stretched to the snapping factor, i ought to assert they don't care. The chaos provides them cover and time to finish getting the rights to Iraq's oil, in spite of everything that is the genuine objective. not something else is sensible for our staying in Iraq. A self-retaining democracy? do not make me chuckle or puke whichever the case should be.
2016-11-23 13:19:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would be quite surprised, shocked and appalled.
First of all, Saddam didn't have any weapons of mass destruction.
Secondly, if the troops pull out, there'll be more violence in Iraq between the Shia and the Sunni's, which are gonna kill more innocent lives.
Congress is damned if it pulls out troops, because it is gonna show the world that they left a country in disaster.
The Congress is also damned if it doesn't pull out troops, because many are gonna dislike the death of soldiers, money waste, etc.
2007-01-11 15:49:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would find that a disgusting occurrence since I know the task-at-hand is NOT complete, and my son has spent two years of his life over there trying to stop terrorism only to be stopped by his own country, the same people who messed up the Vietnam war. We never learn, do we. Not that we shouldn't get involved in such issues but that once you're in there, DO THE JOB, and THEN return home successful. But then, there are the democrats . . .. God Bless you.
2007-01-11 15:26:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Temporary happiness, but North Korea, Iran and others would step up to the plate and we wouldn't have a reprieve.
2007-01-12 03:14:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think everyone would be happy.....'cept the Iraqis. I think that if the US pulls out, there will be fewer people patroling the area and sectarian violence would probably skyrocket if left unchecked.
2007-01-11 15:25:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cheez_Mastah 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
In much the same way I thought about Vietnam, relieved but sorry we were unable to do what we had promised.
2007-01-11 15:24:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dean M 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
It isn't a loan. That money is never coming back.
2007-01-11 15:22:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kacky 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd be quite surprise.
2007-01-11 15:19:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by robert m 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd run for cover.
2007-01-12 18:12:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋