Difference bewteen royalty and nobility?

Question

All of your answers are funny. However, if PR people are going to identify people by their title, they should have some understanding of what type of title it is. They run ads and promotions and really don't know what they are talking about.

Answer 1

Easily explained....I am nobility, my dog is royalty,

Answer 2

Both Royalty and Nobility are signified through your lineage. But Royalty is the class of kings and queens, and only those people with that lineage can achieve that class.

Answer 3

I always thought royalty was being born into a king/queen family. Nobility is a trait that is earned through respect, honor, and bravery.

Answer 4

Royalty is the top of nobility rank.
In the feudal model :
King rules by power of God, nobility rules by power of the king.
Social ascencion is you own nobility by proving it to the king, you can win a kingdom if you are already noble by defeating the king.

Answer 5

Royalty ... persons who have (usually centuries ago) became Sovereign by conquest. [example, William "the Conqueror"] and their descendants, at least to a certain number of generations of descent.

Nobility ... persons who have been given titles and social position. IN olden days, perhaps for great and noble deeds done for the benefit of the country. Perhaps such as the first Duke of Marlborough? Or of Wellington? etc. Usually such titles were inherited by descendants; perhaps for many generations.

And then there are Knights, etc. Chivalry, etc. Or because some politician wants them rewarded.

Answer 6

So address your complaints to the news media, not on Yahoo. What have you accomplished? You just managed to call a whole bunch of Americans ignorant, and although no one really cares about the difference between royalty and nobility, they certainly care when someone lumps us all in one big ignorant pile.

Answer 7

"royalty" - those who are descended from kings and queens... the "blue bloods" so to speak

"nobility" - individuals who have been raised to a title (ex. Squire, Baron, Vicount, Count, Marquis, Duke [although there are royal dukes) and their immediate family.

Answer 8

the Aristocracy isn't based greater on wealth. it is likewise a remember of blood and ancestry. it is unquestionably obtainable to be a duke and have no funds. those titles initially in contact provides of land to human beings in return for administering and protecting those areas on behalf of the crown. that they had certainly duties related with them, and in turn, the holders of the titles ought to alter into prosperous by way of earnings derived from clever land administration and taxation. by way of the years, the titles lost their functional purposes and became greater a remember of a advantages for doing the crown or the rustic in maximum situations a prefer, a provider. in addition to, the kings began granting peerages -- dukedoms -- to their sons, so as that they might no longer be commoners. (particular, a prince could properly be a commoner. purely the sovereign and the friends interior the united kingdom are no longer.) Royalty ruled or reigned over the rustic. the Aristocracy as quickly as functioned as severe-point directors, executives, and protection stress leaders. on the instant the the Aristocracy exists purely as a holdover from the previous and is unquestionably in accordance with ancestry, no longer funds.

Answer 9

royalty is given nobility is earned

Answer 10

Royalty "gained" prestige while nobility "earned" prestige.