English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know that intel is coming out with Intel Core Duo Extreme, but its too expensive. Amd is sure to come out with somehtin just like it. But for your money, which one really is better?

2007-01-11 14:42:46 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet Hardware Desktops

Intel has the quad core..hence(INTEL CORE DUO EXTREME!) but will amd come out with a quad core as well?

2007-01-11 14:47:47 · update #1

11 answers

Depends on how much of your money you are gonna spend. The cheapest Core 2 Duo is $180, and is faster than all but a select few AMD chips, which are more expensive. The FX-62 is probably a little faster, but is $600, and is beaten by the $320 Core 2 Duo model. So basically from $180 up, Intel wins with the Core 2 Duo. Below that, AMD has the battle won, with its $130 Athlon 64 X2 3800+ beating any Pentium D or Pentium 4 out there. For less than $100, go with the Athlon 64 single cores, the easily outperform Pentium 4s.

EDIT: Okay as for the Quad Core, AMD has something that compares to quad core. Basically it is a motherboard that allows you to run two dual core chips, hence you end up with 4 cores. They call it 4x4. It is just as expensive as Intels Core 2 Extreme, and loses in the benchmark battle. Intel has also just released a slightly cheaper quad core, called the Core 2 Quadro, for less than $900. AMD will be releasing true quad core processors this summer, coinciding with their new K8L chips, which are supposed to retake the performance lead from Intel.

EDIT2: Saw the answer below me, sorry I forget this the first time since so many AMD people love this line, but when a processor outperforms another, it outperforms it in everything. This idea that the Core 2 Duos are faster, but the AMDs are for some reason still better at gaming is false, a faster processor is faster, PERIOD. In fact, games are where the Core 2 Duos advantage is most evident.

2007-01-11 14:48:17 · answer #1 · answered by mysticman44 7 · 0 0

Intel is more desirable popular initially. they actually have a more desirable coaching set for traditional day by day projects. also they are more desirable effective interior the experience that they could yield a larger overclock and a a lot a lot decrease middle voltage. it really is more desirable of a benchmarking/overclocking CPU. AMD on the different had gives you decrease expenditures with first rate performance. AMD's CPUs do not overclock nicely in any respect. you'd be fortunate to break the 3GHz variety with them. they are more desirable for gaming interior the experience that they have got a more desirable image processing coaching set than Intel does. on the different hand AMD middle voltage:overclock ratio is horrid. This motives Intel to run a lot cooler than AMD's in case you basically want a gaming computing device a twin middle 2.5GHz+ will be solid from AMD. in case you opt for benchmarking/overclocking Intel will win. For multimedia that's iffy. The Intel will probable win with there more desirable powerful coaching units. i'd say about a ninety 5% chance of that. i exploit a AMD proccessor at present and am pleased with that's preformance, authentic international sensible.

2016-10-17 00:58:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Since I work in the industry, I can tell you that right now Intel is beating AMD, but not by much.
As far as to which one is better, they are both pretty much the same, the differences are very minute.
If I were you I would choose the one that offers the best price, in this case it would be AMD.
No, I don't work for AMD.

2007-01-11 14:48:17 · answer #3 · answered by selfrob 4 · 0 0

People keep asking this. AMD in best for gaming and Intel is best for production. Applies even if they are duo core or quad core or a single core.

2007-01-11 14:50:52 · answer #4 · answered by brilcream 3 · 0 2

AMD processors run cooler, opposed to intel CPUs. I prefer AMD as a Custom Computer builder.

2007-01-11 17:14:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That's a loaded question. There's no clear victor. It's just like asking whether a PC or a Mac is better.

2007-01-11 14:45:13 · answer #6 · answered by chrisatmudd 4 · 0 0

Most major computer manufacturers include Intel processors in their computers, so apparenly they feel that Intel is better.

2007-01-11 14:47:03 · answer #7 · answered by j 4 · 0 0

The E6400 overclocked.

2007-01-11 18:10:50 · answer #8 · answered by Ballzy 6 · 0 0

if it's price you care about then sure go with amd, if it's quality and performance then spend the little extra and get the boost you want.

2007-01-11 14:46:19 · answer #9 · answered by projectglitch 1 · 0 0

I got AMD Anthlon 64, as long as its that one your good!

2007-01-11 14:45:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers