have cheney as pres next comes his speaker of house im not going to get into this so now how many agree we cnnot impeach bush cuz we get cheney also what about haliburton funding war given to cheneys ex co try this one
2007-01-11 14:21:14 · 5 answers · asked by sunshine 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
"covered all corners >means to me like chess u take me out i got cheney i never see him unless he shoots his guy and the guy is apoligizing for him getting shot for cheney whats wrong in that visual ps this is only for intelligent people who can figure it out i dont want stupid rep answers
2007-01-11 14:43:09 · update #1
Nothing illegal?? What do you call the invasion and destruction of Iraq? It certainly is not the soldiers fault, they don't give orders, they obey them. The C-in-C is responsible. The administratin lied through their teeth to get this thing going, now they are adding fuel to the fire. VietNam all over again.
2007-01-11 14:55:34 · answer #1 · answered by P.A.M. 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Another drunk question?
The line of succession is Bush, Cheney, Pelosi then a former KKK leader named Byrd.
What's Haliburton got to do with it? Besides, they were the only company that could do the job and they lost money on the deal. That's why the KBR subsidiary is being sold off.
Of course I doubt you read much or you'd make more intelligent questions.
As for Iraq, Clinton said they had WMD's and he was telling the truth. Where those WMD's are now is either Syria or Iran and they'll bring them back as soon as we get out. And that was just one of 20 reasons we went in there. Top of the list was the 17 UN resolutions they broke with.
2007-01-12 14:18:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Many conservative loyalists have a tendency to cherry-p.c.. stats and information that favors their slant at the same time as ignoring something else that could want to likely run opposite to their view. however, it is going to likely be said that impeaching Bush and Cheney this late contained in the 2d time period is slightly unnecessary. also, even if there have been adequate information of against the law, there are not adequate votes contained in the Senate to really convict. Political bias is a huge aspect in determining the outcome, basically because it changed into the perfect time round (Clinton).
2016-12-02 03:48:56 · answer #3 · answered by cheathem 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, I've read statements in pure french that make more sense than this. However, we will not impeach Bush, since he has not done anything illegal.
Hate, bash, protest all you want - the man will be here til '08.
Still, the V.P. would not be a viable option if in fact Bush was impeached.
2007-01-11 14:25:49 · answer #4 · answered by The Savage Jaw 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What are you talking about?
2007-01-11 14:28:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋