Why is abortion legal, but yet someone other than the mother who kills an unborn baby can get charged with murder?
2007-01-11 13:38:32 · 13 answers · asked by Dark Helmet 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I can't believe I got a thumbs down! All I did was ask a question!
2007-01-11 13:46:12 · update #1
Dog Lover-So you are saying it's ok to play God here? How about if I went ahead and punched the pregnant crack addict in the stomach (I'd never do it people, just illustrating a point). Why should I get charged with a crime? The sword cuts both ways.
2007-01-11 13:50:03 · update #2
Gee I wonder???
Because anti abortion legislators pushed for it to be so as part of their crusade against abortion maybe???
2007-01-11 13:43:01 · answer #1 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
So, I take it that any female who aborts is a assassin, and must be dealt with as such. Hmmm...what about ALL females, GLOBALLY speaking? you in trouble-free words see the international by skill of your eco-friendly and priviledged youthful eyes. wealthy international locations are in the minority. What about each and each of the observe's females - no longer only females from the wealthy, stepped ahead united states in which you've been fortunate to were born into? Did you get the prospect to %. a stepped ahead and wealthy united states in which to be born: 'NO'. are you able to emphathise with females from different elements of the international? i imagine 'NO' is back the greatest answer - you only do not CARE; it truly is not any longer YOUR project, greatest? That makes you the very hypocrite you alluded to on your question! 'in accordance to the assistance provided in this document, more suitable than one out of each 4 pregnancies that take position around the international in accordance to annum is unintended. even as more suitable than 2-thirds of those bring about abortion, oftentimes on the fee of the womani?s existence, an rather large huge style are carried to time period. Over the approach this learn almost 88 million little ones were born because the top results of unintended being pregnant... there is sparkling evidence that little ones because of such births face extensively higher ailment and untimely death charges. that's noteworthythat this large style is more suitable than two times the be sure of 40 million AIDS orphans expected by using the year 2015, with the large social consequences this portends...females residing in the most underprivileged situations bore the utmost chance.the excuses for this epidemic of unintended pregnancies are as different because the human condition. Poverty, sick health, concern of social ostracism, displacement, rape, incest, maternal depletion/exhaustion and moms who're both too youthful or too old to carry a baby properly to time period are only an rather few of the the reason why females search for to reduce the style of youthful little ones born to them'.
2016-10-30 21:13:24 · answer #2 · answered by canevazzi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hyprocrisy is a suit worn by two parties!!
Don't abort but shoot but it will be your problem on how to feed it.
So bring it into this world and let it starve to death!!!
I really don't know many people who are pro abortion. I know many who are pro choice. Pro-choice means the government is not making the decision for the individual. What a constitutional idea! One might even call it less government!
2007-01-11 14:15:13 · answer #3 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here's the deal....
I am about as far Right Wing Conservative as it comes.... Hell, I find Rush to liberal for my tastes sometimes.
BUT.
When it comes to abortion.... I would rather see unwed Mother welfare trash abort these "cells" instead of bringing more unwanted children into the world who are just going to be abused, used and kicked to the curb.
I am sick and tired of my tax dollars going to support generations of losers because they are to lazy to work but have plenty of energy to sling dope and have sex.
So, is abortion an appropriate form of birth control? NO.
But, is it better than bringing a child into the world that never had a chance from the time of conception? Yes.
2007-01-11 13:46:57 · answer #4 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Here it is 2007, and we still have men concerned about the contents of a woman's uterus! A woman's reproductive health is no concern to you or Congress or churches. It is a personal situation and Republicans of all people should back off of interfering with a person's decisions. Uterine contents are not legislation for a bunch of nosy citizens to use as a polarizing topic in American politics. Mind your own organs!
2007-01-11 14:20:14 · answer #5 · answered by whrldpz 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think you can argue abortion because it is so sittuational. But i don't think it should be used as birth controll. But you cant argue hunting because if we didn't because we have killed allot of natural preditors everything would overpopulate and we would eventually die. It's just when is it alive. At birth right, it is when you are officially born, can you be alive without being born, late stage abortion is gross but early i'm fine with.
2007-01-11 13:58:37 · answer #6 · answered by Jester 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is a good question ,and i for one will be looking for the answers here to see what our people do think of even if they are capable of thinking
2007-01-11 13:45:49 · answer #7 · answered by james w 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have raised this same point many times.The answer is because the pro abortion crowd knows that they are wrong.If not they would fight these laws tooth and nail.They don't because fighting for the rights of someone who assaults a pregnant woman would illustrate how absurd their position really is.
2007-01-11 13:44:35 · answer #8 · answered by Michael 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Interesting. Don't know. Don't read much into abortion.
2007-01-11 13:43:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You got me! I think murder is murder! Even if it is unborn.
2007-01-11 13:53:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋