2007-01-11 13:29:09 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
No I don't.
If Kate Moss lived in an ordinary house she would have the social services down on her like a ton of bricks!
And Rimmel sells economical cosmetics and is aimed at the young market - so because of that I find it immoral to employ her!!
2007-01-11 21:56:55 · answer #1 · answered by kiku 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I don't understand why she's a model in the first place. She is not very pretty, in that camera commercial, she looks like she's just wandering disorientedly around. Kind of like a crack wh*re.
Anyway, she should not have her modeling contracts taken away just because she was caught doing drugs. I'm sure the industry knows of many other models who do that kind of thing. Also, actors don't seem to lose too much work when they are caught doing something illegal, so she should be singled out.
2007-01-11 21:34:13 · answer #2 · answered by fruitcakeweather 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No because its like the products that use her are sending out the message that its ok to take drugs. A lot of young people look at these ads and think 'oh I want to be like her' and the fact that she hasnt been punished in any way gives out the completely wrong message. I dont see whats so great about her anyway. Shes not exactly stunning and shes got gross teeth
2007-01-12 01:34:11 · answer #3 · answered by fallenangel 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If some people go on to take drugs because of the famous video,
It wasn't Kate who put it in the public eye where it might have some effect. It was a bunch of dog-journos. Such people never take the slightest scintilla of responsibility for what they do. If it had stayed private it would have no "encouraging" effect at all!
It is not in the PUBLIC INTEREST for the scum-press to encourage drug-taking.
2007-01-11 21:53:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Am I the only one on earth who can not see what the big deal with Kate Moss is? She is just not that pretty, but the industry loves her....
and no...to your question.
2007-01-11 21:31:54 · answer #5 · answered by Kiss My Shaz 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes i think she should be still doing the adverts,she's a model not a role model and she does a fantastic job at what she does,evey body makes mistakes its just that she's in the public eye.
2007-01-12 02:39:27 · answer #6 · answered by j 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
to be honest with you i don't think she should, just for the simple fact of what she has done with taking coke, after she was found out she is bigger than she has ever been, i just don't get it.
She should of got it alot worse, than what she got ie burberry dropping her from her contract, and other companies, but she has really made-up for it now.
To me this is setting a bad example to teenagers, as she is a role model to soooo many teens, they are gonna think that its ok to do this that its cool also to the model industry aswell as she did snort coke and didn't really get punished for it, seems to me if you have the money to pay for BIG expensive lawyers to get you off then you're fine.
Now shes back with that loser again, i think she is getting married to him aswell.
2007-01-11 21:37:55 · answer #7 · answered by louise h 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Drugs are'nt good,but what is everyone whining about.if you removed every celeb that did drugs from the screen what a boring world it would be.
And i don't think i could go on living without Johnny Depp!
2007-01-12 05:10:30 · answer #8 · answered by Countess 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't know exactly who she was (I am not interested in skinny women, you know), so I looked at some of her pictures on Google. Now, I am the one who has a question: WHY IS SHE A MODEL?!
2007-01-11 21:41:21 · answer #9 · answered by mrquestion 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Isn't she the highest paid model? I don't think she should be in any advertisements. That's like saying " wear our make-up and you could be a crackhead too"
2007-01-11 21:33:39 · answer #10 · answered by pro2call10 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋