I don't get y peopel are so upsupportive of our pres. I think he's great. He's a great man with great morals. He's a man's man. You people need to stop getting your opinions spoon fed to you by Michael Moore. sure our deficits are at an all time high, but who says deficits are bad? That's just what the lieberal media want you to think. I say we give dubya a third term.
2007-01-11 12:24:07 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Dubya: the greatest prezident in history for criminals and asswholes
2007-01-11 12:27:28 · answer #1 · answered by mumtaz 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
It replaced into frequently happening as Persia up until eventually 1959....i visit dodge the historic heritage lesson, because you requested truly for Iran.... Iran has traditionally been a Shia and Sufi usa (both are sects of Islam), regardless of if there are nonetheless Zoroastrians (the historic Persian religon) living there. Iran had tremendous kinfolk with the U. S. and the Western international up until eventually 1979, at the same time as The Shah replaced into removed from skill and Ayatollah Kohmeni took skill. the U. S. and the Shah if Iran were such good pals, the U. S. gave him 4 military Cruisers, a number of F-4 jets, or perhaps a US Treasury printing Press so that they could print their own American money (it replaced into the in effortless words such press to ever go away the country). In 1979, the Islamic Revolution grew to develop into Iran right into a fundamentalist Islamic state, which took over one hundred hostages on the U. S. embassy in Tehran. Diplomatic kinfolk between the U. S. and Iran were fantastically a lot non existant ever on account that.
2016-11-23 12:58:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
at this point, bush's legacy is in deep trouble.
i seriously doubt that any scholars will come to the conclusion that bush was the greatest in history - if for no other reason other than no one knows why he makes the decisions he makes.
here we are, getting ready to escalate the war in iraq, and no one even knows the real reason why we went there in the first place.
we all know that it has nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks and know that we will never get any payback for 9/11 in iraq.
and we all know that it wasn't for weapons of mass destruction.
but bush, and his terrible instincts feeds fuel onto a fire that he doesn't even know why he started.
as long as the war in iraq continues, it has the chance of spreading.
if is spreads it could have a devastating impact on the entire world.
bush's legacy will stand alone but only because he will be the first president to structure the thinking patterns of an addict into the white house.
each generation has it's great sin.
the things they did, the things they did not do, the things they tolerated.
these are the things that we are left to ponder at the end of each day, when the lights are out and we are left alone with our thoughts.
those who voted for bush, especially the second time, must be wondering a bit in those private moments lately.
i'm so glad i didn't vote for bush - let you who did struggle with your conscience...
2007-01-11 13:20:29 · answer #3 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry about your recent head wound. Hope you get over your dementia soon. . .
I don't like Michael Moore, but I don't like Bush more. As for the spoon fed? I look at what the man has done/is doing to our country, and it nauseates me. The man is nothing more than a puppet for the Republican party, doing the bidding of the corporations and his daddy and his guys. I am sure the man has some brain cells, but he hides it so very well.
2007-01-11 13:42:10 · answer #4 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who says deficits are bad? Let's see, what other country had a major deificit. Try post WWI Germany which experienced the worst inflation in history. The Deucthe mark was worth less than the paper it was printed on, and a single loaf of bread costed a million marks. It would take 60 years for Germany to recover economically and would cost millions of lives and two wars, one of which was the deadliest in history. That's why deificts are so bad.
2007-01-11 12:31:38 · answer #5 · answered by John S 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Forget the docu-drama's. I'm a republican and I can't stand this guy. We were supposed to be after Bin Laden. Why the heck are when Iraq? What's the deal with hanging Sadam? Don't get me wrong, the POS doesn't deserve to live, but we're not fighting a "war on terror". We're in occupation to free a foreign from it's dictatorship. That has nothing to do with Bin Laden organizing terrorist attacks.
2007-01-11 13:04:33 · answer #6 · answered by Honesty given here! 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who says deficits are bad? Freidman. Barrow, Greenspan, Smith, Ricardo, Malthus, and every other conservative economist either classical or neoclassical. Even liberal economists believe deficits should only be used when necessary and when the crisis ends the debt should be paid down.
2007-01-11 12:31:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush is the ideal sock-puppet the PNAC neocons wanted and needed. They convinced him he will go to heaven and he went along. Maybe the PNAC gang even promised him 70 virgins along the way.
As PNAC goes down in flames along with Iraq, Cheney and the rest run to their spider holes and leave Bush to take the hit. Cheney remains a "draft-dodger" to the end.
2007-01-11 12:37:38 · answer #8 · answered by expose_neocons 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
George Bush is the president who triggered World War III.
2007-01-11 12:32:58 · answer #9 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I say that being you think he is so smart, you should volunteer to serve in Iraq. When you come home without an arm, leg, eye, or all of them then tell us how wonderful he is.
2007-01-11 14:03:35 · answer #10 · answered by madisonian51 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dubya should give himself the presidential medal of honor.
2007-01-11 13:12:17 · answer #11 · answered by maxin and relaxin 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋