Did Bush order the F/A 22 to be deployed in Okinawa and USS Carrier John C Stennis to deployed carrying F/A-18 Hornets and F/A 18C Super Hornets? and if so why do you think?
2007-01-11 12:20:14 · 9 answers · asked by PROUD TO BE A LIBERAL TEEN! 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What possible benefit could there be for a first strike in North Korea? Do they have anything worth the millions(potientially) of deaths that would cause? If a carrier task force was ordered into the region it is there as a show of force meant to send a message to Kim Jong Il that the U.S. watching him. This is a deterrent to North Korea sending two million men over the DMZ. Don't forget that the NKs have a nuke now. Its probably low yield and unreliable, but it is a nuke nonetheless. Don't look for the U.S. to do anything overt in NK without a mountain of evidence that they are planning or are responsible for some aggressive act. I know what you're thinking...but Iraq is not North Korea. A troop of girl scouts with BB guns could have taken Iraq. Not so with North Korea.
2007-01-11 12:35:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are no doubt secret plans for a possible attack against North Korea, as there are such plans for all sorts of situations. But attacking North Korea would not be a good idea.
I would hope that Bush would not think about doing this. I could not see how he would have the constitutional authority to do this unless the North Korea attacked us. There would be no support for these attacks and it would cause a massive catastrophe.
2007-01-13 10:25:00 · answer #2 · answered by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Stennis was scheduled to deploy right now anyway. It is the routine tour. At least that's what I was told. My brother knows the CO's son. Orders could have changed within the last few days.
2007-01-11 20:25:08 · answer #3 · answered by Jon M 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No.
However, let's note that we're still at war with North Korea. This is the situation that is the very model of what the Iraq situation would've looked like in 50 years if Dubya would've continued the status quo.
2007-01-11 20:24:42 · answer #4 · answered by geek49203 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1) I haven't seen this. Do you have a link?
2) We always have planes in Okinawa & a carrier group in the western Pacific.
Is there any unusual deployment? If we attack N Korea, we will probably use F-117A's & B2-A's. Have they moved froward?
Without more info, it would be irresponsible to draw any conclusions.
2007-01-11 20:33:14 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yippeeee! The rape room will be gone. The massive starvation will dissappear. Slavery will be ending soon. Extravagant palaces will now be dismantled for housing project. Kim chee for everyone, yeahhhhh!!!
Don't you guys have any feelings for downtrodden people???
2007-01-11 20:41:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well it's about time
2007-01-11 20:24:31 · answer #7 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because he wants WW3.
fortunately he will live and walk out side and suffer the most horrible death with radiation.
hooray.
fortunately for me i moved and wont have to deal witht he nazification of america the neocons would have you suffer through in years to come.
No soldier will be camping out in my living room
2007-01-11 20:27:42 · answer #8 · answered by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope.
2007-01-11 20:28:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋