the Eagles are versing against the Saints away, and i want know what you guys think about the two runningbacks.
2007-01-11 10:57:35 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
please answer honestly. no hatin on the Eagles or the Saints. if you don't have anything to say about the question, please don't answer it. GO EAGLES! YEA!
2007-01-11 10:58:51 · update #1
westbrook, because he has more experience while reggie bush is just starting, eagles D can and will stop him, westbrook is a dependable person and can get you points when you get him the ball at times, bush is still a rookie remember so you dont know if hes still capable of not fumbling scoring w/e else
2007-01-11 11:53:26 · answer #1 · answered by Rowell C 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well Westbrook has more experience and Reggie is still a rookie that hope to be as good as Westbrook, so Westbrook, but the Saint Will win again, it may be by 3 but I just got tickets to the Game and what a game it will be, I'll tell you this much if the Saint beat the Eagle there going to the Superbowl,
2007-01-11 12:39:12 · answer #2 · answered by man of ape 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a completely unfair comparison. Brian Westbrook has been in the NFL for far longer than Bush, so the tendency is to lean towards him. But Reggie has accomplished what he has as a part-time runningback whereas, Westbrook pretty much carries the load full-time for PHI. I think Reggie Bush is faster, more agile, and just has more raw talent than Brian though. When it's all said and done, I think even as a part time rusher, Reggie will end up with better numbers at the end of his career by far.
2007-01-11 11:06:15 · answer #3 · answered by s8n_spawn 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Brian westbrook is by far the better runningback right now but in a few years i can see reggie doing some of the things westbrook is doin...i mean reggie isn't even the number 1 on his own team
2007-01-11 11:02:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Westbrookk got more experience and he is just BETTER than Bush. Didn't u see how much fumbles Bush had this year? He is just overrated in the NFL. Westbrook is basiclly carrying Eagles on his shoulders with Garcia. He is good. He can do everything as a RB. If Saints didnt' have McAlistir or Brees, Bush aint' gonna shine in the NFL. Bush is just a big play maker instead of a stable RB who does good every game like Westbrook. I think Eagles might win if they make Dante Stallworth do more big plays.
2007-01-11 11:10:45 · answer #5 · answered by scofield24z 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think Brian Westbrook is a better running back than Reggie Bush because Reggie Bush has less experience in the NFL but I still think he is a good Running back but is not as good as Westbrook
2007-01-11 11:05:28 · answer #6 · answered by marasic 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Brian Westbrook... the man is havimg a career season 1,910 yards rushing and 11 td's.Bush eventually will be a great runningback but you have to face facts,Westbrook is the real deal sportsfans.
2007-01-11 13:06:10 · answer #7 · answered by tomel68 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will say Westbrook is better now because he has the experience. Give Reggie a few years and he is going to be VERY dangerous. (As long as he stays healthy.)
2007-01-11 12:12:56 · answer #8 · answered by hailtotheredskins1 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush all the way! ( and i don't mean our president!)
But hey look at the guy
-fresh out of college and he is with a team that was relocated for a moment because of hurricane katrina and a year later they are the number 2 seed for the playoffs.
-bush may not be the best running backs yet, but in a year he is gonna be one of the best in the league.
-who knows maybe he'll go on to be one of the best players that ever played the game of football?
----You never know what is gonna happen?
And right it isn't a fair comparison.
2007-01-11 11:45:05 · answer #9 · answered by football junkie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Westbrook. Only a late season surge prevented Bush from being considered a borderline bust. He wasn't even the best rookie on his team.
2007-01-11 11:13:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋