he had to deal with a tsunami,hurricane katrina,the cowardly attack on U.S.soil by radical islams,and the attacks from the liberals,how well do you think you could have done?
2007-01-11 10:11:07 · 14 answers · asked by schflng 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
buffalo.....if he personaly didn't do anything,if he sits on his can and lets everyone do everything for him,then how could he ever done anything wrong? when are you going to realise this?
2007-01-11 10:35:46 · update #1
goat.........if you do not believe that the tsunami did not hit American soil,then you need to learn more about diplomacy,this tsunami hit many pieces of soil that had Americn intrests,and if you truly believe this,as the leader of the biggest country of the world,you would be hated more than pres.Bush.we even sent money to pakistan after that earthquake.pakistan doesn't even like us.you are right about katrina,it was botched!but of course,pres Bush was the first pres.in the 200 year life span of the levies,that heard from the Louisiana govenors,and mayors that those levies are ready to break.you know that that as pres.he expects his underlings to take care of their business(not unlike your boss)fema was a victom of katrina,they had supplies to take care of the hurricane,when the levies broke,their supplies were washed away.GOAT,with what you wrote,you would be hated by the same people that you,and others hate.you would not be able to do what Bush has survived!!!
2007-01-11 11:04:45 · update #2
rosenro+>>>>>>>aren you right? the pres.does nothing?cheny does everything?then why blame pres.Bush?if i were pres.(this comes because i was a soldier)and i know how dangerous the radical islams are,if i committed troops,i would have levled iraq,and get set up for the war that iran believes they must go through.when you understand the complexities of a country our size has to endure,you will understand.when we are victors,nobody messes with us,when we are cops,all the little countries slap us,and other little countries stand back,and see what is going to happen.if i were pres.palistine,& iran. would be eliminated.radical islam is never going to allow this world to live in peace,someone must stand up and say enough is enough,and kick their ***.
2007-01-11 11:20:36 · update #3
crossndun......... Americas gov. gave 1 billion $
2007-01-11 11:22:55 · update #4
I didn't seek the office! It is anawesome responsibility.
many men like Lincoln, Kennedy, FD Roosevelt, Reagan and Clinton faced awesome challenges and rose to the occasion quite well.
He (Bush) is an OK persom, but not a capable president. Neither was Carter. It's not the party it's the person.
2007-01-11 10:20:24 · answer #1 · answered by rumbler_12 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Better then him and he did not have to deal with the tsunami, with hurricane Katrina after the first day I would have sent the National Guard for help and there is no way I would have attacked Iraq unless Sadam was making threats or attacked the United States
2007-01-11 10:41:04 · answer #2 · answered by Justin L 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The tsuanmi was more charities then government, so you can't claim that. Hurricane Katrina was handled extremly poor, it was botched by all aspects of government, if he took more action, there most likely would have been as many problems surronding the issue. If you look at 9/11 closely, you see that it was very suspect, and still could have been handled better throughout the various levels of control. Also, his dealings with the middle east have been extremly poorly handled as evidenced by the problems with us and the middle east.
If it was me, all I can say is that I would have handled things much differnetly
2007-01-11 10:20:36 · answer #3 · answered by crossndunk 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think so far so good, wish hed tighten up on border control, but hey hes doing a better Job than clinton could have.
theres no way I could have delt with the stuff half as good as he has
2007-01-11 10:24:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The tsunami didn't hit the U.S., Katrina was botched(we should have spent Iraq money on Katrina, our own citizens) and we never caught the terrorist mastermind, Bin Laden. Those things led to the attacks by liberals. If he hadn't screwed up everthing he touched, maybe people would like him.
2007-01-11 10:17:15 · answer #5 · answered by The Goat 2 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 on trumped up charges and lies; Bush invaded Iraq on trumped up charges and lies.
2007-01-11 10:21:26 · answer #6 · answered by chunkymonkey 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Done great so far with the evil within and without, and the left bashing him over lost elections and their lack of patriotism, anti-America always attitude, and defeatism
I'd have been cowering in a closet as the left is
2007-01-11 10:19:33 · answer #7 · answered by bob b 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
A lot better than he is doing. The words incompetent and failure come to mind first.
2007-01-11 10:24:17 · answer #8 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Thank you, finally someone agrees with me. And Buffalo, what do you want our President to do? Suit up and go fight in Iraq? Go down to New Orleans and live with the victims? That would be stupid, what president do you know that has physically done something to assist? Anyway This is a really good question and i agree totally, he has taken a lot of crap from everyone, and he is under a lot of pressure leading the toughest job in the world.
2007-01-11 10:18:01 · answer #9 · answered by E-Street Band 2 · 4⤊ 7⤋
You are absolutely right
For Buffalo.....if thats the case, why does everyone blame Bush?????????????
2007-01-11 10:16:34 · answer #10 · answered by PoliticallyIncorrect 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋