English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

thus be impeached for being a lame duck president
and no democratic bills passed

2007-01-11 07:07:06 · 11 answers · asked by Republicans tjhink bush nevr lie 1 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Read the 4th Amendment. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

2007-01-11 07:27:04 · answer #1 · answered by davidepeden 5 · 0 0

N O!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!President Bush cannot be impeached for being a "lame duck" president and not having any democratic bills passed!!!!!!!!!

2007-01-11 15:12:51 · answer #2 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1 0

Yes, Bush did break the law. He then worked to change the law. That doesn't retroactively make his past deeds legal.

Michael N, we were attacked by Radical Islamics, but what does attacking Iraq have to do with that? And in turn, how do random wire taps make us any safer?

2007-01-11 15:15:14 · answer #3 · answered by toso13 4 · 0 1

Yes. Laws were broken. The question is, does the War Powers Act allow him to break them.

2007-01-11 15:11:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Your bitterness over Bush makes you look petty and childish. Get over it. All Liberals have in their arsenal is the tired rhetoric of how much they dislike Bush. A bunch of radical Islamists attacked our country and we are fighting back. What is so difficult to understand about that? If Clinton were in the White House would you be asking for his head too? The answer to that is NO. Clinton would have understood their pain and then sat on his hands. So please find another argument. Because yours is getting really old really fast

2007-01-11 15:10:13 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 6 4

i love wiretaps, im not not talking about terrorists attacks against the US and im not talking about drugs.

democratic bills are just stupid

2007-01-11 15:17:00 · answer #6 · answered by libshateme 3 · 1 0

YES BUT SINCE HE GOT BILLS PASSED AFTER THE FACT HE FIGURES HE DID IT LEGALLY......BAD BUSH BAD BAD BUSH

2007-01-11 15:10:30 · answer #7 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 1 2

No, when National Security is at stake he can, why are you hiding something other than your ignorance?

2007-01-11 15:10:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

he didnt break the law because he made a law that basicly says the constitution doesnt mean anything anymore.

2007-01-11 15:10:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 6

HUH???????

2007-01-11 15:10:57 · answer #10 · answered by Megara 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers