English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WHy do LIBS, in the absense of rational thoughts and an inability to propoud salient points of view, instead drag our nations discourse into the gutter. Why do the empty skirts of the media trumpet every bit of filth and ignore the truth?

WHY??

2007-01-11 06:37:40 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

LIBS, face the damn relavant facts and look at the other crap LIBS are posting instead of answering my quite salient if ostensibly controversial inquiry.

2007-01-11 06:50:18 · update #1

15 answers

Ends justify the means, whatever they have to do to win is ok and if anything bad happens, it's not their fault. Like Clinton signing permission for Sandy Berger to get into classified archives to remove documents proving they knew about the Al Quiada threat but failed to brief the incoming Bush adminstration. The political and economic fallout of 9/11 was more advantagous and important than the loss of life, just as every death of American servicemen they encourage through the international news media helps their cause. The democrats have rode blood to power, like they let killers out of prison to kill more people, to justify taking firearms away from law abiding citizens.

2007-01-11 06:48:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

What Truth? Who's Truth?

What is true varies from person to person based on their level of intellect, education and life experience.

Some claim that "Truth" is what sounds right. If that were "TRUE" then anything I can make sound right would then be the truth? no.

Answers or the Truth must be based on facts. Facts are well documented, researched and historical bits of information that are gathered, analysed and studied. Facts tend to have a more Liberal bias because the liberal mind tends to be curious and tends to believe that there is an explanation for everything. As such most artists, scientists, physicists, doctors etc are liberal. The world's most well regarded leaders have also been Liberal (JFK, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Abraham Lincoln (yes he was a Lib, as was anyone fighting for the Yanks or the Independance from Imperialism). etc).

Liberals think, they just have a hard time trying to explain it to Conservatives. Afterall... most cons won't even read a link with a factual document. Look bellow.

2007-01-11 06:58:02 · answer #2 · answered by Richard LaRose 1 · 3 0

What liberal elected official has made a coarser public statement than Mr. Bush's characterization of Adam Clymer, over a public-address system? And what liberal elected official has made a coarser public statement than Mr. Cheney's famous remark on the floor of the United States Senate? Was Howard Dean's shouted, "Yeah!" really so terrible, by contrast?

2007-01-12 05:30:05 · answer #3 · answered by granypatsy 1 · 0 0

Someone's been spending time with a thesaurus, haven't they? Know how I can tell that you're trying to sound more articulate than you are? You misspelled one of the "big" words you were trying to use, and your punctuation is atrocious.

Instead of using impressive vocabulary, why not speak simply and clearly and get your point across? Kind of like this:

Everything in your post is complete crap. You didn't back it up with a single fact or example. It's sort of like me posting something that says, "Why are all horses purple?" Saying it doesn't make it so.

2007-01-11 06:43:35 · answer #4 · answered by Megara 3 · 5 2

That's pretty funny! Don't you see the irony of asking a question like that complete with all of your false assumptions about liberals?

Post a question of substance and you'll see about the liberals ability for discourse. If that's what you want anyway...

2007-01-11 06:47:10 · answer #5 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 3 1

Looked at your profile. You just joined today and this is how you lead off?

There are those on both sides of the political spectrum that do this...and you are heading in that direction it seems.

Reasonable minds can differ given the same set of facts.

2007-01-11 06:44:44 · answer #6 · answered by harrisnish 3 · 2 1

What is so rational about invading a country based on LIES?
George Bush and his administration LIED to American public.
I repeat....George Bush and his administration LIED to the American public.
Fabrications.
BS
What is so rational about invading a country based on LIES?
And...if you want your question to come across as more intelligent,
Try using spellcheck.
Your question looks like it was inaccurately copied from somewhere else.
Intellectual:)

2007-01-11 06:54:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Why do conservatives try to attribute their faults to liberals. One of the biggest examples of this is the name calling and very coarse discourse of O'Reilly, Limbaugh and Hannity, all rightwingers. Talk radio which is overwhelmingly conservative is notoriously vitriolic. Coarse discourse is owned by the conservatives.

2007-01-11 06:47:55 · answer #8 · answered by Raven 5 · 4 1

Who else can satisfy your natural urge to bend over. Notice I didn't call you any names buttfook? Sorry Raven I have no patience for these cretins. Their statements are so bizarre I just can't look away.

2007-01-11 07:00:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Bush hatred... Because Bush "stole" the 2000 election they are unable to maintain any type of rational discussion.

2007-01-11 06:42:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers