Big Bang fly in the face of science and the laws and principals of thermodynamics. Lets be logical people.
In the First Law of Thermodynamics: matter cannot be created or destroyed. In the beginning to the Big Bang, there is nothing present to explode, and zero energy to explode it. There are zero observations, or documented test results for spontaneous generation, let alone matter from nothing.
Expecting to have matter, and energy just show up, when none is present is like taking an absolutely empty box, and after billions of years, or any other amount of time, expect to open that box, and inside have a operational world in all its complexity. Spontaneous generation something out of nothing, used to support the Big Bang is in direct conflict with the first scientific Law of Thermodynamics.
2007-01-12 08:58:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by RangerWright 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Scientific theories are never really proven---they are explanatory stories that have observation and experiment to back them up, and they need to tie into a web of other scientific explanations in a consistent manner.
At bottom, however, one needs to accept the idea that the Universe is best understood through observation, experiment, and rational thought, and that other stories told by people or books that are inconsistent with well-established scientific theories are unlikely to be correct. Many people do not accept this idea, particularly if they've been taught from childhood to accept a particular religious dogma or book as the ultimate source of truth in a way that trumps personal experience, experiment, and observation. Unfortunately, most people continue to believe the dogmas that were drummed into them as children, and cannot escape from those modes of thinking.
The Big Bang theory, the evolution of the Universe, and the evolution of life all have a very large amount of evidence for them. (Most of it rather different than the examples you cite in your question, however---you need to read some physics books. In particular, the cosmic background radiation is electromagnetic radio waves, not sound.) They are the current best story as to how we got here from a much simpler beginning. Science does not, however, explain why there is something rather than nothing---it doesn't explain existence. So there is still a gigantic mystery that scientific methods have not been able to approach. I am OK with that---if something is unknowable, I can let it be unknown. Other people need a story to explain everything, whether it is explainable or not.
2007-01-11 07:21:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by cosmo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Big Bang Theory is actually accepted by the Catholic Church now as canon.
The reason is because it does not rule out the possibility of First Cause. I.E. God.
However, they've also had to make many changes to dogma to incorporate science, and the current accepted age of our Universe. The world being created in 7 days, the 40 year march of Moses and the Israelites, are all now thought to be metaphor by any learned theologian, those people who still take such things literally are largely uneducated.
The reason the Big Bang theory was unaccepted for so long by the catholics (and some religions still), is for the same reason that they would execute scientists for postulating the Earth is round, even in the face of a milennia of experiment and evidence. And that is, religions in general are made to endure with a specific set of "truths" that are based not in fact or reality, but faith.
Information is the fastest changing aspect of our lives, people accept it or not and change slowly, systems of belief based on a large group of people change even slower.
2007-01-11 07:02:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by kaleban21 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The big BANG is not true. It has never been proven and never will be although it has been disproven hundreds of times already, yet it still gets pusblished. The big bang theory is this. A tiny dot the size of a period (.) <---- yes that period was spinning really really fast BILLLIONS of years ago and it exploded into what we have today. So nothing exploded yet it created everything. Hmmm Nothing Exploded yet Created Everything. Nothing into something??? I can't buy that theory I'm sorry. And to disprove the Big Bang theory, that tiny MASS was spinning in one direction so everything that was produced from the big bang would spin the same way. How come some of the planets and moons are spinning in different directions than the rest?????? Big bang doesn't make sense evolution is wrong. If you think evolution is right you're saying that we evolved from rocks so the next time I step on a rock I can say I stepped on your great great great etc. grandpa.
2007-01-11 07:02:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by bugen3029 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
It's not accepted by major religions because the religious doctrine itself has to be explained by the only source of religious doctrine... the bible, or the torah, or quran, or whatever else is the source.. so churches are not going to take a position on something religious that has been "proved" by science.
as for individuals, like the one who proposed the big bang theory, can find in their own hearts how their beliefs coincide with science.
2007-01-11 06:59:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by collinchristine_edwards 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We didn't pick up the sound of the big bang. Sound isn't light - it needs a medium in which to propagate, so it won't go through space or just 'float around' in space. The light that was found by COBE and WMAP represent the leftover heat from the expansion, in the microwave part of the spectrum.
2007-01-11 07:09:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by eri 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not sure why some religious groups oppose the Big Bang theory. After all, it was a religious person who originally proposed it.
2007-01-11 06:48:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that he created the universe by chain reaction, first making a chain reaction. Before the big bang there was nothing, not even time. Out of the big bang came time as well, meaning that time will not live enternally or forever - that's the truth.
God created time.
2007-01-11 07:26:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Crow 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because if you believe that God created the world, then he most certainly can create radiation, dinosaur bones, and all that.
For those of you who ask why God would do that, I don't know, except that what makes sense to God doesn't make sense to humans necessarily, because His thoughts are so much higher than human thoughts.
2007-01-11 06:46:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by smartypants 2
·
0⤊
0⤋