English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-11 06:07:21 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Consumer Electronics Music & Music Players

7 answers

never cared for the shuffle idea. Its okay but its not necesary for more storage on the shuffle. Because you only put songs you like on there anyway. Just get a NANO

2007-01-11 06:28:00 · answer #1 · answered by ukee49 2 · 1 0

I think that it kinda sucks. . .

My reasoning, your friends says, "Hey, do you have (insert song here)?"

"Yeah, I do just a second." The second turns into minutes as you go through every song to find it. Yeah it's small, but that's because it has no screen and can hold only 240 songs. In my opinion, unless you don't use it often. . . good only for only about 7 yrs. and under.

If you want small and fuctionality: iPod nano.

2007-01-11 06:39:40 · answer #2 · answered by 5 · 0 0

it's a great companion to my video ipod just hit auto fill from your library and its a traveling dream when you don't want to carry gear!

2007-01-11 07:42:57 · answer #3 · answered by Brian H 1 · 0 0

i think the are soooo cute but they need at least a small screen but are good for runners :)

2007-01-11 07:41:03 · answer #4 · answered by corky 2 · 0 0

it needs a screen. other then that, yeah it`s cool.

2007-01-11 07:13:31 · answer #5 · answered by </3 4 · 0 0

it's great but i need more memory on it

2007-01-11 06:20:26 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

i love it it is so tiny

2007-01-11 06:32:18 · answer #7 · answered by waffells 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers