Aliens planted bombs and Ken Lay pushed the handle.
2007-01-11 05:35:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
There is just as much evidence to support the following theory as the ridiculous claims they make. And in this theory the guilty party is a lot more likely than the government.
If it was demolished, the only ones who had anything to gain were the conspiracy theorists. So, I blame them. Loose change was only produced because those who produced it were responsible for blowing up the WTC. They are the people who killed 3000 people and ought to be brought to justice. They should come clean and admit they are behind it, not the government. Why do they keep producing such flimsy evidence to blame someone else when it is all a whitewash of their own terrorist activities?
2007-01-11 05:56:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Elizabeth Howard 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
i do not comprehend the position you get the concept that "no metal body construction contained in the historic previous of guy has ever collapsed from hearth". it really is the most uninformed remark i have ever heard. Stuctural metal doesn't could attain any the position close to its melting factor to fail below load. one among our organizations homes burned basically the different day and fairly a lot collasped. It turned right into a unmarried tale construction and in consumer-friendly words burned for a couple of minutes. The community construction officials required an inspection by way of a structural engineer and various of alternative structural contributors had to get replaced in the previous shall we occupy the construction. metal channels and attitude irom contributors of trusses were warped and distorted. contained when it comes to the WTC metal joist assisting the floor above the hearth failed and collapsed crushing the floor below etc. yet that become in consumer-friendly words the start of the cave in. It doesn't take a structural engineer or a genius to appreciate that the flooring presented lateral help to the columns keeping up the handfuls of flooring of creating above. the importance of laterial help to columns is fairly easy to appreciate. If I honestly have somewhat of metal a million/4" in diameter and its in consumer-friendly words a million" lengthy it would want to extremely help 500 lbs. yet when I took an identical piece of metal, in reality more effective of it 10 feet lengthy it doesn't help its own weight vertically and can want to bend over. even as adequate of the interior flooring broke loose contained in the WTC the outer columns lost their laterial help and buckled (collaspsed) permitting the handfuls of larger flooring to come back crashing down. once they'd fell in consumer-friendly words some feet the momentum of such weight become very just about unstoppable and beaten the decrease flooring. Then the surprising supply up on the bottom allowed the better flooring to overwhelm themselves. i do not comprehend why it truly is so not hassle-free to appreciate?
2016-12-29 03:27:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I KNOW what didn't cause it. It did not collapse due to a demolition. It takes too much prep to inplode a building for someone not to notice all the wall weakening and det cord that has to be run. Surely someone would have asked what the heck is going on here long before 911.
2007-01-11 05:41:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by namsaev 6
·
6⤊
0⤋
Honestly, how do you explain that noone noticed people wiring the building for detonation or ever reported anything suspicious going on?, Im sure it is not easy to wire a building for detonation. Thats the thing about conspiracy theories, they dont require any proof at all.
Edit: If it is that easy dont you think the terrorists would be wiring buildings and destroying them left and right?
2007-01-11 05:44:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Government Demolition.. same as The Twin Towers
2007-01-13 09:07:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by jgroup01 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Loose Change brought up A LOT of good questions that NEED TO BE ANSWERED!
I don't understand why everyone is so quick to brush it off as a "conspiracy". There are ways of putting the theories to end, so why don't they allow the information to be availiable.
I definately think that the gov't either had prior knowledge to a pending attack and took advantage of it by doing a little house cleaning. As well as giving the US the right to attack Iraq (Who had noting to do with 9/11 FACT!)
By the way anyone know where Bin Laden is? That one worked out real well.
2007-01-11 05:42:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr L 1
·
0⤊
4⤋
Get the heck off the internet and start thinking for yourself. It's a ridiculous conspiracy theory.
2007-01-11 05:38:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Morey000 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
It was caused by Bush and Bin Laden in their conspiracy to control the heroin and oil trades.
2007-01-13 11:04:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cracker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
check out the videohttp://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=Loose+Change
Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut - Google Video
2007-01-11 05:36:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Devil Dog 2
·
0⤊
3⤋