Al Maliki or Bushco....?
I noticed last night the President couldn't quite make up his mind if the plan was an Iraqi idea or whether his new Generals patched it up together........ I await the disarming of the Al Sadr army.. not going to be easy.
I fear Maliki, like Saddam, is going to find out what it's like to be a friend of Bush.
2007-01-11 05:02:35 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He telegraphed it in the speech in that chilling aside about Iran. To fully realize their plan he will start attacking Iran's support of those inside Iraq by hitting Iran enough to provoke a wider conflict. Then he can "liberate" Iran as well, going for full Dominion over Middle East oil! This has been carefully planned out from the start. They have plundered Iraq and the US Treasury for $3 billion a week, while muscling their way for Dominion, and when they take down Iran, their plan will be complete. Watch and see how they play this out.
2007-01-11 05:07:10 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
How the plan was formulated, and who was responsible for authoring it is anyone’s guess. Considering how much of a puppet Bush is, I doubt very seriously that he thought of it. Ultimately who will get the blame for the inevitable failure of this new deployment of troops won’t be Bush, considering he will be out office before the true ramifications can be assessed. The person who will accept culpability ultimately will be the President that comes after Bush, who will be charged with cleaning up the mess, or the head of the Iraqi state.
2007-01-11 17:04:29 · answer #2 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Democrats will blame the Republicans. Republicans will blame the Democrats. The surviving Iraqis will blame America.
2007-01-11 13:07:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Republicans will blame democrats (Clinton especially) and Democrats will blame Bushco. the way it always works. hopefully no one has to take the blame and it works. i don't like bush but i would like to see this over with.
2007-01-11 13:09:11 · answer #4 · answered by summer love 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush
2007-01-11 13:07:56 · answer #5 · answered by White Shooting Star of HK 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Clintons!
Had voters not had "Clinton fatigue" and had Hillary's Senate campaign not attracted funds away from Gore, Bush would never have been president.
:)
2007-01-11 13:14:26 · answer #6 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am sure like all neolibs you will get a big kick out of it because your whole life revolves around making Bush look bad and failing rather that having America succeeds in it's endeavors that is so pathetic sad and a little sick.
2007-01-11 13:14:03 · answer #7 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The buck stops at the president's desk. So, it has to be the President of the United States, George Walker Bush!
2007-01-11 13:07:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Bushco gets the blame from here at home... and they both probably get a lot of blame.. with Bush getting a little more.. in Iraq.
Steph.. Your wit and sarcasm is not lost on me!
2007-01-11 13:06:12 · answer #9 · answered by pip 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
The president of the US is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces and the buck for all military operations stops there.
Besides, he's the idiot who lied us into this war in the first place.
2007-01-11 13:07:24 · answer #10 · answered by Gabriel D 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋