What do you think of the Republicans in the Senate threatening to use fillibuster to block a non-binding resolution disapproving of Bush's plan to send 22,000 more troops to Iraq? Personally, I think it's a pathetic use of a fillibuster to block a resolution which has no power of law. Have the Republicans really been reduced to this?
2007-01-11 04:53:56 · 7 answers · asked by ? 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think that a non-binding resolution of disproval is a pathetic use of taxpayers money and wasted time by public servants. If they want to disprove on their own time (and their own dime), fine.
2007-01-11 13:01:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree it's pathetic that they are emulating the Democratic strategy for the last 12 years. People expect more from the GOP than that crap.
2007-01-11 13:05:12 · answer #2 · answered by Whootziedude 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are using many fo the same tactics that the Democrats have used for the past 8 years.
2007-01-11 12:59:15 · answer #3 · answered by PDK 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a total waste of time. So are "non-binding" resolutions.
2007-01-11 12:59:45 · answer #4 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What we need to do is get all of our peeps, civilian and military out of there, destroy everything of ours that we cannot take with us, and them bomb the hell out of that place. Iran included.
2007-01-11 12:58:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am ashamed of how republicans are not backing up their president.
2007-01-11 13:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by J.C. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋