in Iraq. Does anyone know who that democrat(s) is?
2007-01-11 04:47:11 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The only one with half a brain!
2007-01-11 04:51:29 · answer #1 · answered by tx girl 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
don't recall the names (Pelosi??) but i will concede the fact that there were democrats calling for a troop increase.
looks like we've got 2 sides on the same coin.
Lieberman doesn't count as a dem.
2007-01-11 13:02:14 · answer #2 · answered by . 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the overall general thinking, whether one is republican, democrat, or independent, is that it is simply too late. This would have been a great plan several years ago. It's like someone deciding to finally quit smoking after they've been diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer.
2007-01-11 13:01:52 · answer #3 · answered by Not so looney afterall 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not me. But I remember a republican a couple years ago suggest the insurgency was in its last throws and then a year later say he still felt it was true and then a couple of week ago admitted he might have been "a little over-optimistic".
Anyone know who that republican is?
Hint: It's Dick Cheney.
2007-01-11 12:55:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Some democrats were for troop increases before they were against it before they were for it. Any more questions?
2007-01-15 12:38:49 · answer #5 · answered by laohutaile 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pelosi was calling for an increase two years ago but she flop flipped. I believe that Lieberman is in favor.
2007-01-11 13:10:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nancy Pelosi, Dick Durbin and a whole slew of others the point is they were never serious it was simply being against anything that Bush suggested, it's that simple.
2007-01-11 12:53:50 · answer #7 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Barrack Obama, Hillary Clinton.. a few of them have suggested as such. Democrats are free to think for themselves. They aren't as partisan as Republicans.
All I'm going to say is if this surge in troops does nothing to help... then what? Keep sending American men and women to their deaths?
When is one dead soldier too many going to be reached? 4,000?, 10,000? 100,000?
2007-01-11 12:53:36 · answer #8 · answered by Richard LaRose 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Charlie Rangel.
2007-01-11 12:55:46 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton for one.
First the dems say "not enough troops', then it's too many troops.
They can't do anything without reading the dailey polls.
They are utterly confused.
2007-01-11 12:53:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Goes to show you, there are crazy democrats as well!
There are plenty of Repubs against it! The dont want to get thrown out of office in 2006!
2007-01-11 12:55:18 · answer #11 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋