It was an inside job! As far as I am concerned, there is no doubt about it! I have seen the films, and I am more than convinced, I am angry and I am scared. There is so much more going on in our own corrupt government than any of us really knows...but the truth is coming out. We have to open our eyes and see it, in order to fight it! We are already losing our freedom of speech! I just had a question removed because it hit a nerve. I am furious, because I don't want to live in the kind of world that they are trying to create, and we can't win this war against corruption, unless we wake up and fight! If this answer is removed, then I will know that they are monitoring this forum, and they don't want us to get too close to the truth, and that they are censoring, and I will have to find some other place to speak out from!
2007-01-18 07:26:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Inside job.
1. Towers 1 and 2 fell at near free-fall speed. The government's "pancake" theory would take 60 to 100 seconds for the buildings to fall. It actually took about 10 seconds. This indicates that explosives were used in the buildings.
http://www.911revisited.com/video.html
2. World Trade Center building #7. This building was not hit by a plane, yet after two small fires burned on the 7th and 12th floors, the building collapsed at near free-fall speed. The lessee of the World Trade center complex also admitted that he had the building "pulled."
http://www.911revisited.com/video.html
3. No wreckage at the Pentagon. If a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon, where is the wreckage? If you look at original (not photo shopped) pictures of 9/11, you will see no wreckage belonging to a Boeing 757. Pay special attention to the lawn in front of the Pentagon. The office government story is that the plane bounced on the lawn before hitting the building, yet the grass is pristine.
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
4. Missing Gold from Towers. About $720 million of gold and silver went missing on 9/11. The vaults held about $950 million in gold and silver according to vault records. On 9/11, only $230 million was recovered. The metal was not melted either, it was gone.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/gold.html
5. The lessee, Larry Silverstein, took out $3.5 billion dollar insurance policy on the towers in July, 2001, just 6 weeks before the attacks. The insurance policy specifically covered terrorist attacks. In 2003 he was awarded $7 billion because each plane was a separate attack ($3.5 billion for each attack).
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/owners.html
6. On the FBI most wanted list, Osama bin-Laden is on the top, but he is not wanted for any connection with 9/11. Why? Seems like a simple enough fix, yet they don't do it.
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm
There is a little information for you about what really happened on 9/11.
Recommended Documentaries:
9/11 Revisited
911 In Plane Sight
9/11 The Road to Tyranny
Loose Change
Terrorstorm
9/11 Press for Truth
2007-01-18 19:24:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Marcus 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt it could have been stopped with the environment that existed then. There was a huge dropping of the ball in 2001 with Clinton leaving and GW taking charge the terror ball was never really passed. There were many who said at the time the Clinton figured it was GW's problem now and GW thought since most attacks happened in the last administration it didn't concern him so the terror side of the government was not going at full swing, on top of that no attack like that had ever been done so it was unexpected. It is known that a lot of the hijackers were being watched but since being a terrorist is not illegal nothing could have been done.
This is a lesson that politicians should take to heart. When the passing of power happens the passing of responsibly on all aspects of national security and domestic programs needs to be taken, there should never be a gap in the future of readiness.
Now since those attacks there have been changes, people are more paranoid and willing to fight back. Prior to 9-11 you just waited out the hijack and chances are you would live, now since there is a chance you will die anyway people are more willing to fight. There is a lot more scrutiny. I doubt you will see an attack like that again soon.
2007-01-11 12:22:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by JFra472449 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Are you crazy? I understand that people like to invent conspiracy theories in order to keep the subject alive and engaging, but just think about the question you're asking?
1. Your first question is too general. The answer is: We all have overwhelming abundance of information about 9/11. There is enough public information to write several books on the subject. What exactly do you want to know?
2. How can Bush prevent that? He is just a guy! Who the hell you want him to be? A devil with supernatutral powers? Before people like you start running your mouths, you should think just a tiny bit. Terrorists will have to succeed in their mission just once, the anti-terrorist forces will have to be successfull all the time and everytime. Given this fact, I think it is remarkable that since 9/11 the terrorists couldn't strike us anywhere in this huge territory. The British couldn't prevent a terrorist attack on their tiny patch of land and the Spanish failed to protect their slightly bigger but still tiny land. (No offense to the British, I was there in London on that day, I mean 7/7/05, and I am impressed and proud of their swift and effective response. I was also in New York on 9/11. My heart is with all the victims and their families. )
However for people who love to exagerate things out of proportions, here is a little food for thought for you: Perhaps J.F. Kennedy's assasination, Princess Diana's death has something to do with 9/11. Maybe J.F.Keneddy and Diana were the same person! Have you thought about this? How about Michael Jackson and Mickey Mouse? I think they are the same guy too. Notice their similarities in their voices, the gloves, the love of little boys, etc. Walt Disney and Hollywood perhaps are branches of CIA and they must be up to something. I think they are after me and you.
2007-01-11 12:31:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Erdene A 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I honestly believe if Clinton had done his job by going after Osam Bin Laden we could have avoided 9/11 and not have been in a war that is unjust.
2007-01-18 20:33:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no why would you think that? A lot of goofy hair brained idiots have tried to make up all kinds of stuff about 911. It happened pretty much the way they say it did. The planes were all hijacked at once and that was that. If Bush was so evil and clever, why did he not plant some phoney WMDs in Iraq and say "here they are". No, the people who are into the conspiracy are complete and utter boneheads.
2007-01-11 12:15:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Best thing to do is do your own research. Look at Loose change and others on Google video, Alex Jones. But basically Bush and Cheney and other cronies planned it to further their own new world order and personal agenda. Look up project for an new American century.
2007-01-18 01:28:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by masterplumber75 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
conspiracy theories abound. it goes on and on. every war was started by our government . Busch had no clue what was going on at the time. Just look at the video when he was told of the bombing. he just sat there in his chair with those school children like a bump on a log. well, believe what you want.
most history is bunk anyway.
2007-01-19 00:39:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is totally crazy. President Bush was not aware of this horrible disaster until it happened. He was taken of guard as we all were.
2007-01-18 09:25:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sasha 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, it couldn't have been prevented & no nobody "let it happen".
No matter how many thousands of times this question is asked, the answer is the same. NO!
2007-01-12 23:07:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
2⤋