i mean come on cena vs taker or orton vs mr big mouth edge vs the animal that would sweetness off the charts
2007-01-11 04:07:08 · 6 answers · asked by mrfranchise1 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Yes they do. Elimation Chamber for title unification, at Wrestlemania. That'll be hot.
2007-01-11 04:11:34 · answer #1 · answered by j.soto416 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree and have felt that way for awhile. Keep the 2 shows but get rid of the exclusive brand wrestlers. We end up with the same matches week in and week out. How many times did we see King Booker and Batista in matches on Smackdown! rather it was singles or tag team. If all of the wrestlers just appear on either show at any time, you have more possibilities and will make this a lot more entertaining. Back in the day Smackdown! and RAW did not have exclusive athletes so I say go back to those days.
2007-01-11 04:21:23 · answer #2 · answered by WHEELJACK 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what wwe needs to do is eliminate ecw and make smackdown live ,find a way to put smackdown on cable so the program wont be as censored, and put the program back on thursday. I enjoy michael cole and jbl and there is alot of talent to just have one show and that would hinder alot of talented wrestlers from actually being on the program. I do believe the programs should be totally discreet until the ppv that comes around that interpromotes them together that makes it more interesting.
2007-01-11 04:43:13 · answer #3 · answered by Wes B 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
put all three brands together. It would make for a wide range of angles and storylines
2007-01-11 04:33:26 · answer #4 · answered by YWWE>BVW>mwwe 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes after WM23 or 24!!!!!!!!
2007-01-12 03:05:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
this sounds like "Days of our lives" and "Passions",I don't want to combine those,so we shouldn't combine the soaps "Smackdown" and "Raw"
2007-01-11 04:12:02 · answer #6 · answered by Linda C 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋