President Bush: "Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial integrity and stabilizing the region in the face of extremist challenges. This begins with addressing Iran and Syria. These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use their territory to move in and out of Iraq. Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops. We will disrupt the attacks on our forces. We’ll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria. And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq. "
2007-01-11 03:47:59 · 12 answers · asked by Mail J 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
It would be something if we finally gave Tehran their much-deserved attention-getter. This is a war much larger than Iraq or Afghanistan. It's a war against Islamic fascism. Iran and Syria are right in the middle of all of this. They have enabled and supported the insurgency in Iraq with bodies and arms.
Don't forget that a large amount of the "insurgents" are actually foreign fighters. These are terrorists from neighboring countries. Of course, the media doesn't want you to know that. They like to paint the "gunmen" (the media's second-favorite word for Islamic terrorists after "militants,) as Iraqis only....Iraqis unhappy with the occupation. Not so. This is foreign interference.
Hopefully the White House follows through on the threat. If Iran continues to supply the insurgency...if Syria continues to allow them to cross over their border...how about some air strikes to put them back in line? They've certainly had it coming for quite some time. Of course the Democrats would probably condemn that too.
2007-01-11 09:34:07 · answer #1 · answered by Ro! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suppose you think we should just look the other way while Iran and Syria shelter and aid the terrorists. We are fighting people who are serious and mean business. We have to act the same.
I don't want to attack Iran or Syria but I surely want to prevent
terrorists and weapons crossing the border and threatening
our troops.
2007-01-11 06:19:56 · answer #2 · answered by HAROLD C 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
shall we see now, Syria is the suitable chum of Iran. Iran needs to kill human beings or convert all of them to Muslim. i ask your self why the president received't confer with them? You opt for capturing the president and be conscious how a techniques you get. i doesn't care if he's Dem. or Rep. you doesn't get very a techniques. you keep your Muslim hatred to your self. no longer in contact.
2016-12-29 03:11:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I fully support President Bush and his new strategy to win in Iraq by starting 2 more wars with Iran and Syria.
President Bush knows what he's doing and has the best advisors, so we should trust him.
2007-01-11 03:56:41 · answer #4 · answered by ghostwriter 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
GIT ER DUN!!! The decision to focus on these two countries is sound and they should be dealt with severely and with extreme prejudice!!
2007-01-12 19:00:20 · answer #5 · answered by red d 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good to see Bush has learnt lessons from the Iraq situation.
2007-01-11 03:59:29 · answer #6 · answered by Tuppence 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, greater potential for American casualties and regional instability. Who, but someone with an I.Q. greater than that of a dust bunny, wouldn't be excited?
.
2007-01-11 03:58:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think it's very exciting to live in a country that rewards a failed administration by allowing it to add to its failure.
2007-01-11 04:00:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I bet they are shaking in their boots
2007-01-11 14:37:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I would be more excited to learn that Dub-ya had been assassinated.
2007-01-11 03:55:12 · answer #10 · answered by willow oak 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋