WACKO JACKO or STEVE IRWIN
2007-01-11 03:17:57 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Steve Irwin (RIP) because that crock could of ate his baby alive, at least someone could of caught a "blanket" from off a balcony. :)♥♥
2007-01-11 03:22:29 · answer #1 · answered by summer ♥ 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wacko Jacko
2007-01-11 11:23:56 · answer #2 · answered by spun_up_06 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just saw that Wacko Jacko clip the other day. I get more bothered by that the more I see it. The baby was kicking its feet in protest at being dangled over, what, a five story balcony. The man belongs in JAIL for that alone, never mind his appetite for little boys.
2007-01-11 11:24:01 · answer #3 · answered by porkchop 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably the first one. I think Steve Irwin had too much good judgment to put a child in danger.
2007-01-11 11:21:01 · answer #4 · answered by Tony M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wacko Jacko...Although I don't agree with Steve Irwin, he didn't dangel!!!
2007-01-11 11:24:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jacko's, hands down, that baby is in danger even when it's not being dangled off a balcony
2007-01-11 11:22:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
steve irwin's...only because if MJ's baby would've fallen, there were plenty of onlookers down below to attempt to catch him. poor little bob irwin however would've just been another noonday snack for a crocodile.
2007-01-11 11:28:45 · answer #7 · answered by duvaldiva.com 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jackson
2007-01-11 11:20:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the preverts baby is in danger every second wether he's in his daddy's arms or not, he's such a wacko, steve, loved his beloved children so
2007-01-11 11:23:46 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the name "WACKO JACKO" speaks for itself!!!!!
2007-01-11 11:22:04 · answer #10 · answered by Yahoo Anwers 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋