2007-01-11 03:07:22 · 11 answers · asked by james-david m 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
neither, i think this life can be paradise, as long as you watch out for the snakes
2007-01-11 03:13:27 · answer #1 · answered by dlin333 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Living without legs or eyes doesn't sound like paradise to me!
2007-01-11 11:15:15 · answer #2 · answered by ddbird 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would it be paradise if you could not see it or walk through it. Without your eyes and/or legs it would be hell. But, if I HAD to choose, seeing I am already blind, I would to say I would stay that way. I can always enjoy it by listening, or smelling or tasting. But without legs, it would be hard to enjoy any part of it.
2007-01-11 20:26:49 · answer #3 · answered by Cheryl C 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would prefer not to live in paradise and keep my legs and eyes.
2007-01-11 11:11:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely without your legs. If you don't have eyes then you'll just trip over everything anyways, so just lose the legs and ride a sea turtle or something.
2007-01-11 11:48:34 · answer #5 · answered by rawley_iu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't want to live without either! I like my legs and my eyes !
2007-01-15 11:06:51 · answer #6 · answered by JBWPLGCSE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My legs, I'm clumsy enough as it is. Imagine if I couldn't even see where I was going! Without legs I couldn't run into so many things or stumble as I walk.
2007-01-11 12:25:24 · answer #7 · answered by lisateric 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess my legs, because I could always get fake legs
2007-01-11 11:15:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
legs..at least i could see paradise.
2007-01-11 11:12:11 · answer #9 · answered by Ms Toy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eyes; I always have been more entertained by what I heard,(music) anyway.
2007-01-11 11:35:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋