I am referring to today's Supreme Court judgment on 9th Schedule.
http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/jan/11indira.htm
2007-01-11 02:44:07 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
If the executive functions properly i.e. administers and does its job then there would be no need for the Courts to interfere.
There are isolated and minimal incidents where Courts upon thier own motion suo motto called for action from the Executive by giving directions - what we call is Judicial Activism. In all other cases it is we the people who have approached the Courts and sought interference, complaining inaction on the part of the Executive. Therefore it is absolutely unfair for us to say that the Court is crossing its limits. Imagine a situation where we did not have Courts of Law. Then where do we complain and vent our agony. We go on requesting the authorities for simple tasks/ jobs which is our inherent right to put its strictly but the administration hardly bothers.
The recent zonal violations in Delhi called for interference from the Supreme Court since it was becoming a menace and there is no stopping for the illegality. I find it suprising that there were supporters for the violators taking out rallies and dharnas.
In fact we should have taken out rallies in support of the Supreme Court giving out a clear message that we want a civilised nation and not a barbaric administration.
2007-01-11 04:52:38 · answer #1 · answered by thiru 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The constitution enacted has been for the welfare of its citizen but now is it helps the citizen is the question. the Parliament and its members are functioning as tools in the hands of their leaders. no they are not worried about the common man upliftment a ray of hope is seen in supreme courts verdits. But we want a govt. should realise that the people are the real masters. The meritocracy tries to put this point to parliament.
2007-01-16 12:23:49 · answer #2 · answered by RAMKI 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No not at all. This has been created only because non-eligible & only political motivated persons are representating in the House. They think that they are supreme & above law. some of the representatives who think that in the close house they can change/twist the law as per their conveniency. Truly speaking, Law making people's representative should learn from this judgement. It is a good lesson to them.
2007-01-12 04:02:47 · answer #3 · answered by agni 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is definitely a tussle. as we know that the only branch of the govt. that has remained unaffected or little affected of the corruption is the law. but as the parliament is trying to make such laws that will violate the fundamentals of our constitution, supereme court has to interfere. it is welcome that there is someone who cares for the citizens.
2007-01-19 02:30:50 · answer #4 · answered by sunny 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the tussle is between good governace and bad governance.
2007-01-12 05:24:22 · answer #5 · answered by hanvis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It is CLASH OF TITANS and sufferers are poor goats crushed between these TITANS.
Note: Goats = People ( source: Kiran's Dictionary)
2007-01-11 10:48:32 · answer #6 · answered by Kiran 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This shows we are moving from incredible India to impossible India.
2007-01-11 11:53:07 · answer #7 · answered by liketoaskq 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, IT'S A TUSSLE BETWEEN LAW & DISORDER.
2007-01-11 11:11:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋