2007-01-11 00:37:27 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Disagree totally Bush is a liar and can not be trusted.
2007-01-11 00:50:44 · answer #1 · answered by Frank R 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
President Bush is a murderer. If he truly wanted Iraq to survive on their own, then he would not be deporting more troops. First, he promised that with Hussein gone, the military would leave. He lied. Second, he said after Hussein was prosecuted they would work negotiations for bringing troops home. He lied again. In other words, George Bush has been given too much power and it's going to his head. I'm still wondering when he is going to resume the search for Osama bin Laden. The biggest lie so far is that we are fighting terrorists over there. There are only few terrorists in Iraq. The rest are innocent civilians who die for reasons they will never understand. There is no winner in this war. We have lost so many and so have they. My question is when are they going to realize that violence only brings about more violence? We are all going to end up killing each other for a cause that none of us understand. GOD bless every living creature on this earth.
2007-01-11 00:47:45 · answer #2 · answered by cookie 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well Bush also send with the troops someone he loves most ,some close relative, then he will understand what war is about
2007-01-11 01:05:09 · answer #3 · answered by akband 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I disagree and it won't happen if the Democrats in congress have something to do with it. Did you all know that so far....$300BILLION (and still going) have been spent on Iraq already????!! This is enough for free gasoline for every single American for one entire year....or 60 thousand new teachers in the U.S. ...or 600 new primary schools for every state in the U.S.
Time to get our troops out, let them handle their own issues and time to put that money to better use here in the states.
2007-01-11 00:56:09 · answer #4 · answered by davemg21 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Disagree. We need to be working on pulling the troops out, not by starting more things over there.
I think everyone forgot the whole reason as to why we went over there -- to get Bin Laden. Not Hussien, Bush has been wanting a reason to go over there because 'he tried to kill my dad'. He was out for vengence and 9-11 gave him a legitimate reason to send troops overseas.
2007-01-11 00:39:57 · answer #5 · answered by Jo 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The similarities are interior the approaches used with tips from the enemy. In the two wars, as properly to employing guerrilla approaches, they manipulated the U. S. media to bitter help for the war. you're ultimate suited in asserting our casualties are decrease. that's because of the version in terrain and more advantageous guidance and kit on the protection stress's area. The metrics you're saying do no longer exist have been in place in view that precise after Saddam's Regime fell. Our purpose is, and has constantly has been, to establish a competent democratic government in Iraq. stability demands a properly knowledgeable, properly geared up, self-sufficient protection stress and police stress. The complexities of achieving this coupled with having to rebuild each and every thing 4 and 5 circumstances, to no longer point out a laundry record of blunders with tips from the management, have created delays. a important distinction is that the "insurgency" in Vietnam replaced right into a extensive common flow. It replaced into incited with tips from a corrupt and brutal South Vietnam regime. The VC have been subsidized with tips from a properly geared up known military interior the North, the NVA. In Iraq, there's a pair thousand insurrection interior the full usa, no longer counting suicide bombers in view that they only get utilized as quickly as. The inhabitants, as an entire, does not unavoidably like American squaddies, yet see the will for their venture (something you will no longer see on television). in my view, common help for the venture between Iraqis is the reason the war in Iraq has a competent threat of fulfillment. In Vietnam, this wasn't present. the usually happening Vietnamese replaced into waiting for the NVA to roll into Saigon (different than for people who had aided the U. S. that all of us observed interior the in call for video on the embassy on the tip of the war). they could no longer have been excited on the possibility of being communist, yet they have been ill of the corruption of their very own government.
2016-10-06 23:58:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that Bush is putting more troops in Iraq.
2007-01-11 00:39:15 · answer #7 · answered by JoJo The Frisco Fireman 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Disagree he should let them get on with killing themselves when there is no one left he can go in and steal the oil thats what he wants isn't it.Enough soldiers have been lost by all nations it should stop.
2007-01-11 01:09:34 · answer #8 · answered by Mea 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Agree.
If we had brought in enough troops to do the job in the first place the war would not have drug on for so long and I would hazard to guess less American and allied soldiers would have died. Shame on W for not getting the job done right the 1st time.
2007-01-11 00:47:17 · answer #9 · answered by iplaybass1956 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Disagree...did he read the report from the Iraq study group? Did someone remind him that it was from the NON-fiction section of the library?
2007-01-11 00:40:58 · answer #10 · answered by Cindy B 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋