Should the USA pull everyone out and just drop an atomic bomb on IRAQ and end this once and for all?

Question

Why not? we did it before and it ended a war? even though we already won the war in iraq many terrorist are still hiding out there and using road side bombs to hit us, so why not just pull us out and drop one BIG BOMB! what's do ya say??

Answer 1

you foolish trigger happy SOB
what you propose to do is irrational and illogical
it would kill too many innocent people
bombs are not the answer
though niether is sending more americans
we should pull out iraq is fine now

Answer 2

Look there are no terrorist in Iraq. Terrorist against who? The US? They are in their own country. What the hell is the US still doing down there? Most terrorist are in the US and we all know that. Why wont the US army just get the hell out. They aren't doing anything there but killing innocent people and getting killed. What the hell is the matter with you? Are you just plain evil? Drop a bomb? Your talking about lives. Those road side bombs is the only defense they have. The 3000 militians killed isnt anything compared to the 650,000 innocent iraqis killed. This isnt even a war! The US has all the power. Americans treat their dogs better than the iraqis are being treated. US troops leave Iraq crazy and commit suicide. 40% of US troops deaths was suicide. And all the troops that aren't afraid to speak out are the only ones that can tell us what is really going on donw there.

Answer 3

Perhaps you're unaware of the significant differences between the war against Japan and the war in Iraq.

The invasion of Japan was projected to take years at the cost of millions of casualties for US forces - even worse for Japanese. In order to end the war with a minimum of further bloodshed, and to prevent these millions of deaths, the US dropped 2 atomic bombs.

In Iraq, we successfully invaded and crushed the Iraqi army and deposed the Saddamite government in, what, 3 weeks? Since then, we've been focused on nation-building and protection of the people. This is similar to the many, many years we remained in both Germany and Japan after the wars were won, helping those nations rebuild and become democratic and free.

In Germany, there were a number of Nazis who continued to resist our efforts, insurgents, you might call them, who attacked US and German targets. The difference was that there were relatively few of these, compared to the great number of Sunni insurgents in Iraq, and that they were summarily executed in Germany, while we treat them with kid gloves in Iraq.

Considering that the majority of Iraq, both population wise and area-wise, not only are not fighting against the US, but actively support our efforts, and they are enlisting in the Iraqi army to support their own freedom, why would bombing them make any sense whatsoever?

Answer 4

What a silly question! What a silly world!
To end what? You create Bin Laden to resist again Russia, then true or false (nobady really know that, only it's what USA said), it becomes a monster and attck to America. After that you attack Afghanistan, kill many peolple, destroy a country, at least more than what Taliban did. And finally you can't find Osama. Really funny!!
Damn you!
Then you attack to Iraq. Yeah I know Saddam was a dictator. But you supported it during his war against iran, you and many other countries. BTW, you attacked Iraq for its weapon. Did you find them??????????
Now, you attack Somali. For what? killing Alqaidah forces. How can we trust you? You do everything to have more security, to dominate the world and say "We are going to bring them democrecy"!!

You claim that Iran is going to produce nuclear weaponsand don't offer any satisfying reason. But you have atomic bob. You have used it and no doubt that you will use whenever you need it!!!

WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM THE WORLD.
PLEASE SOMEBODY ANSWER ME!

Answer 5

No we need Iraq as a base of operations for the inevitable war with Iran. We need to nuke them before they are able to develop and use nuclear weapons. They are the real threat.

Answer 6

The USA can bomb Iraq. And then Iran and North Korea can bomb the USA. Then Isreal can retaliate against Iran and North Korea with some more nuclear bombs. By this stage Russia and Chine would have joined in too. A whole lot of innocent people would die in the process, either immediately or from radiation sickness and other diseases associated with nuclear energy over time.

Violence does not resolve. It always leads to more violence.

Answer 7

mainly because the North Vietnamese did not (couldn't?) randomly kill thousands of civilians because the jap/Germans/British/US did for the period of international warfare II. i imagine the U. S. has not been harshly judged with information from historic past for the Nagasaki/Hiroshima bombs precisely because the jap were both terrible in China and Southeast Asia.

Answer 8

Hey, I'd love to eliminate all the radical Islamic terrorists who are flocking to Iraq because Americans are there, but you'd kill all the Iraqis as well.

No.

Ketchup: The Saudi terrorists would probably be pretty pissed you called them Iraqis.

Answer 9

That would really defeat the purpose. The US went there to secure all that oil. So now you proprose that they drop a Nuke on it all and make the sacrifice of over 3000 soldiers even more worthless.

I was joking earlier when I said you weren't from this planet but now I'm beginning to believe myself.

Answer 10

Well, it would certainly be inline with Bush's Hitler-like qualities.

Remember that the Jews were seen as such a problem in Germany, just like Iraq is seen as such a problem to the U.S.

So, Hitler came up with his "final solution", to exterminate the Jews.

That's the same idea that you put forth.

Your kind will be out in 2008.