whys it wrong, they are her kids and if people werent interested then the interviews wouldnt be taking place would they?
2007-01-10 22:27:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't buy the mags either but you can't help seeing the covers. Remember she gets at least £50,000+ everytime she invites OK into her mansion for a photoshoot.
What really annoys me are silly women saying that she is a good mother - how do they know, everybody is a good mother aren't they?
Do you really think that being a good mother is letting your blind baby burn himself, and if I recall this is not the first time he's had an accident. She called it a freak accident yet there is absolutely no excuse because he was UNSUPERVISED. I think this kid cramps her style, I saw her giving him an injection on TV once because he needs regular medication and she just whacked the needle in as if he was a piece of meat. She is vile, and horrible, yet I predicted she would capitalise on this accident
Jordan should keep a vigil on her child at home not just for the magazines!
2007-01-11 06:48:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by georgeygirl 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree with you - I don't think it's right. I appreciate that she has a child with a disability that may help to raise awareness but her fame is based purely on her selling her life - Jordan goes shopping, Jordan takes her kid to the cinema, Jordan gets her baps out, etc etc It annoys me that someone has made so much money from not doing very much or having a noticeable talent. Plenty of other people have children some of whom are disabled or suffering from illness and would never dream of selling their story to make money! But I suppose people buy the magazines and are for whatever reason interested in what colour pants she's wearing that day so there must be a demand for it. Each to their own at the end of the day I guess.
2007-01-11 06:36:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Badgrl 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
People like Jordan annoy me. Like Kerry Katona and many others, they are only famous because of their constant babbling about their childhood, marriage, divorce etc...... They make money from the very people who buy all these crappy magazines and for all we know half of their stories are not even true. Does it not strike anyone that they all have so many traumas. Then they will tell you that they telling their stories to the world so that it might help somebody. Please!! How many failed actors, singers and ex glamour models do this??
As for your question, I find absolutely disgusting that Jordan puts her children in the spotlight like this and deny them a life as normal as possible. I have no doubt she loves her children very much but I think her concerns for her fame and purse makes her forget that what she is doing is not good for her kids and will only contribute for them to be bullied at school etc... It is very sad and selfish.
2007-01-14 19:55:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jess 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
she is a celabrity and one of her kids has an illness it could actually help others with children of the same. But in general i dont believe she should use her kids all the time for publicity, she is the celebrity and her kids should be allowed to be kids and not plastered all over mags and papers
2007-01-11 06:28:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by bouncer 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Talentless moose - I agree dude. She is using her kids - especially the disabled little fellow - to gain publicity in blatant fashion. But there's plenty of Hello readers who want to see her over-madeup mug to keep her popping up.
There's nothing wrong with being photographed with them but for the children the time would be better spent - playing, painting, whatever. Kids should come first.
2007-01-11 07:09:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by chillipope 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think it does come across as if shes making money from her sons problems. All poor Harvey has to do is cough and shes sticking him in a magazine. She doesnt have to show shes a good mother by putting it is a magazine for the whole country to see.
2007-01-13 12:28:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Smiley_1714 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
well, they are her children. if she doesnt speak out about them more and more papz will make things up of the top of their heads. shes not putting them in danger, shes not harming them shes simply telling the reader about life with then which the readers are obviously interested in or she wouldnt be in so mnay mags so often. shes a hard working mum who loves her children and likes to get paid to talk about them. mums talk about their kids all day to people they meet in town or at the school gates, im sure they would love to be paid for it!
2007-01-11 06:39:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by LuLaBells 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
As a mother of a disabled child I feel that it is refreshing to see she does not hide harvey away and shows that he is part of her family. Many celebrities hide this fact and stay well clear nothing wrong in that however to see a happy loving family and hats off to her husband for taking them on not many men would.
Harvey is lucky to have good parents like this and ones who will do what it takes to ensure he is treated as normal as possible.
2007-01-11 09:05:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by momof3 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think it shows she is a committed mother and as one of her children is disabled, she is hoping to raise awareness, if you dont like it, dont read the mags!
2007-01-11 06:26:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Denise H 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
They should be able to lead as normal a life as they can... not be in magazines etc all the time.
2007-01-11 06:28:06
·
answer #11
·
answered by Lesurly 2
·
2⤊
0⤋