Bush threatened to go to war with Iran and Syria tonight.
In today's Wash. Post: "Speaking about the two countries tonight, the president said that the United States wiill "seek out and destroy" those who are providing material support to our enemies."
I didn't make this up - He's threatened to invade two more countries last night -- see for yourself:
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2007/01/the_president_giveth_and_he_ta.html
Is he insane or what? This is the REAL reason for sending our trops to HELL! He's lying, again (who's surprised?)
2007-01-10 17:11:49 · 26 answers · asked by Marc Miami 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
He said he's strengthening the Iraq border and installing patriot missiles along there, Definitly looks like he's preparing for an invasion. Like poland 1941, germany stages troops on the border claims shots are fired as they amass on the border.
A military conquest through the mid east right under our noses, two down, amd at least iran on the propaganda chopping block.
2007-01-10 17:17:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 8⤋
He's not sick in the head, he's tired of these other countries being underhanded. Do you want to go out due to a nuclear warfare? Our people know there's a war risk when they enlist!!
It's about time someone steps up to the plate and takes some control over this bullshit going on! War is war, it's not a game. Everyone wants to bash Bush, oh yeah, from they're own couch though. I guess we should just sit back and let these countries wipe all of us off the face of the planet, eh? Or let it all go and have a ground war right here in this country, right? Try being realistic, and stop being haters and closeminded guys. Things are different now, it's not still 1980. Would sure be nice if it were though, wouldn't it? It's all sad, no matter what side you may be for though, but we cannot let it all come any closer. Very sad, very scary.But at least Bush does what he says, he's no pushover, he's got the balls to take control and be our leader, damned good one too!!
2007-01-11 01:21:31 · answer #2 · answered by Wutz it worth 2 ya? 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Is it a winner strategy to make more enemies while in war zone situation. I think there is something wrong here without Iran, Turkey, Syria, Jordan and Kuwait the USA war is useless. The USA policy in Iraq is not an American winning policy. The only new thing in new strategy is the USA is sending more human targets for the Iraqi road bombs. Ask the Israelis why they lift Gaza it was the road bombs where 15 years old kids do it to 160000 solders.
2007-01-11 03:54:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I have heard from many soldiers that the main reason for invading Iraq is because it is the only way to invade Iran. I am not surprised. It has been the plan all along. Oil was the second priority here.
2007-01-11 01:37:59 · answer #4 · answered by Denise 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
My understanding of the situation was that the US would patrol the borders of Syria and Iran to prevent arm`s and munitions being sent into Iraq to help the militia. I don`t think direct full scale conflict was on the agenda. A dangerous situation never the less.
2007-01-11 03:55:18 · answer #5 · answered by dingdong 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
now let me see...im fighting a war in some country on the other side of the globe. ok, my enemies dont have the capability to either make their own weapons or supply their own troops. i know that since they cant do either of these things, they must be getting their support from somewhere else. oh, hey, i happen to know exactly where they're getting all this help from! instead of fixing the problem, i think i'll just continue fighting the way i have been and make it harder for myself to win. yeah, i know how to win, but im not gonna do anything about it.......yeah, i know that sounds like a bunch of crap, but that's exactly your plan of action. if it isnt then tell me what is. we've been waiting since the war started to hear a sensible plan from people like you, but you've come up with nothing. maybe it was a mistake to invade iraq, but now that we're there, we have to finish what we started. if we pull out, we admit defeat and create a bigger problem. what we're doing now isnt working very well because there arent enough troops to do the job. why dont all you fags get some common sense or a better plan.
2007-01-11 01:35:04 · answer #6 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You know he is an opinion columnist right? That Bush said he would seek and destroy those individuals,,he didn't say anything about attacking those two countries. That was the writers view. Most of the article goes on about the new Iraq war plan.
2007-01-11 01:16:52 · answer #7 · answered by in vino veritas 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I loath Dubya.
But for the sake of accuracy...I read a couple of articles about Dubyas speech and looked at the link you provided and I did not see the word :"invade".
And ...the link you provided was not news......
It was commentary.
And Dubya does not have the authority...not anymore.
2007-01-11 01:21:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
What did any of you think was going to happen???
Did you think that Iraq was the end of this? Hell no its only the beginning. Think. look at the big picture
2007-01-11 01:56:08 · answer #9 · answered by lovelornlarry 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
He didn't specifically say invade. there's nothing going on in Syria or Iran that a well-targeted aerial bombing campaign can't fix.
2007-01-11 01:20:49 · answer #10 · answered by Section Eight 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
We will be in Iran soon enough. With or withour Bush's help Iran will attack us soon enough. Bush isn't the crazy one it is the Radical Islamists. You seem to forget it is them that hate anyone that is not Islamic and want the rest of the world to bow to Allah and live the lives they do. Tha includes their own that live among us.As they are not living by their rules either.
2007-01-11 01:20:36 · answer #11 · answered by Jay 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋