If Saddam is an evil, so what about Bush? An angel? Give me a break, Bush caused thousands of civilians died in 4 years, more than Saddam in 30 years.
Lets take count on Afghanistan and Iraq casualties, and compare to Kuwait and Iran did by Saddam.
Bush is the winner.
2007-01-10 17:01:12 · 8 answers · asked by movexz 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Actually its in the hundreds of thousands. Sadaam ruled a country where the mentality is so uneducated, that the only way to rule is with fear. Not every country is educated enough to understand much less appreciate democracy. But ironically it is Bush's own greed and lack of education of the mindset of the majority of the middle-east, and its hatred for America that has caused the deaths of many many more civilians than Sadaam's regime. Just tonight I was talking with my brother-in-law who is town from Iraq for my mother's funeral and he said that its a "god awlful mess"! "We are there for monetary reasons and nothing else." He went on to say that the people were far better off than they are now when Sadaam was in power.
As patriotic as I am I cannot deny in my heart that for the first time in our history, our president is in fact a "war criminal" and corrupt, and should be prosecuted with the same fairness and severity shown to Hussien! This is a very, very sad time for Americans because I know their hearts as well as thier minds are torn and confused. Its very hard for us to think that our country and its citizens can be so manipulated and used by such a tyrant. But probably the toughest part of it is that we as a country by the power of our vote is also to blame. This is a very,very tough nut to swallow. I know I choke every time I hear about another death...another soul lost to such a horrible and senseless war!
This war has brought shame to us all!
2007-01-10 17:31:03 · answer #1 · answered by CSnumber1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam is much worse, All the mass graves he had dug for all his own people he had killed.
But that doesn't justify that Bush, killing our innocent soldiers, who are just doing their "JOB". The numbers will go up but we are no where close to the numbers of suddam.
Russia fought over there for 10 years and left defeated. Why does Bush think he'll change anything there? Matter of fact why does anybody think Bush will solve anything over there.
Sandy
2007-01-10 17:15:28 · answer #2 · answered by sandy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There were no war crimes as regards the President. You may not like that fact, but that doesn't change it. Saddam was a blatant murderer...case closed.
2007-01-10 17:11:24 · answer #3 · answered by Rich B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your forgetting to count the innocent people that Saddam killed in his own country.
2007-01-10 17:10:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The fool dems will save blaming Bush as long as they are able to. difficulty is, each thing is now their fault. it quite is Barry's signature on the SH*T spending. it quite is not Bush's fault.
2016-12-12 08:52:33 · answer #5 · answered by scheiber 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I absolutely agree!! Bush is worse
2007-01-10 17:15:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say they are equal!!!
2007-01-10 17:04:38 · answer #7 · answered by elizabeth v 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
wtf saddam is far worse then bush
2007-01-10 17:05:24 · answer #8 · answered by Sam 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋