If only he were "MAN ENOUGH" to go over there and fight...... What a beautiful day..
2007-01-10 16:31:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by "RED" 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
My question first to everyone that has already answered and to thee postee is this, How many of you have personally been overseas and in the war? I understand that some of you may have been and that's ok, but I believe your statements have a lot more credit to them if you can say that your not pulling that **** right outta your ***. Either way, the major dilema going on currently is "if we pull out now, will all of the fallen soldiers have been for nothing" or "stay in and loose even more soldiers, marines, airmen, and seamen, but still see no improvement' or "stay in, loose a few more fighting americans, but accomplish the mission" Truly none of us can see the future, so I guess time is all we have and to hope that we have made the right decisions.
2007-01-10 16:39:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by marissaklump2004 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
You should consider yourself a happy man considering you already collected some 8 answers on a question of doubtful significance on top of being "impolite to the top man in our (and yours too) government. this being on record. the short answer is --there are many angles a President and his advisers consider in extending a conflict resolution -- and it is a complex one thus if the President decides to go on with the mission, that is it until his replacement takes the White House in due course. Please do not interject other elements such as "Islamic" or other "calling names" to a subject that should be taken seriously since as you stated "human lives are involved". and I say hats off to that part of your question for caring. hope it helps.
2007-01-10 17:33:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by s t 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is there anyone on here that doesn't have a Liberal mindset? And no, I'm not a Republican/Conservative. I consider myself independent...I have a brain, it works just fine, and I don't need to follow a particular group because they have a little letter (R) or (D) behind their name.
Keep in mind that a very large majority of what we hear is coming from a Liberal biased media.
We've lost more soldiers in single BATTLES in past wars than we have in all of the Iraq war. But Americans tend to forget things like that when it doesn't fit their agenda.
It's war, people die. Our soldiers know that and know the risks when they sign their name on the line. I rarely mention it, I have no need to, but I am a veteran so I'm not necessarily talking out of my butt.
2007-01-10 16:49:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
the supervisor justice, John Roberts replaced into particularly born Soviet Georgia, he's out to break democracy by potential of giving companies, personage and subsequently all the rights of a individual. Clarence Thomas is a plant from the See of Rome. He particularly replaced into born in Nigeria yet his beginning certificates replaced into easy to forge. he's out to make all of usa, black and brown Catholic company slaves. His grandfather bought slaves to white adult adult males. Barack replaced into regrettably born in Hawaii and all this hubba hubba is a smoke exhibit screen so the likes of the two above are ignored.
2016-11-28 03:31:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is totally out of touch and he wants the rest of the country to close their eyes and just go along with anything he says. What a dangerous tool! When was the last time we were allowed to see any of the many, many caskets coming home on the news or in the paper. He thinks that if we don't see them, we won't know how many of our soldiers are dying or coming home disfigured.
2007-01-10 16:39:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
VERY well said Jedi Mind Tricks! It's amazing someone on here actually said something that was thought out! I guess it escapes some people that the military is actually in place to *gasp* fight in wars!
2007-01-10 17:19:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
292,000 = the number of US soldiers killed in WWII
671,000 = the number of US soldiers wounded in WWII
Do you think that 3000 troops killed in this war is worth helping a country get out from under a dictator as sick in the head as Saddam was? Don't be such a dumbass.
2007-01-10 16:35:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by freakyallweeky 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
without this war bush's party would be broke! Think of all the arms dealers cashing in! I think we should send bush over there, give him a gun and see how long he survives.
Bless all there poor souls.
2007-01-10 16:30:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
He doesnt give a s**t. To him another troop in Iraq is another bonus on his paycheck!
2007-01-10 16:32:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋