IT SEEM THAT WILL BE AL QAEDAS NEXT MOVE TO GET EVEN FOR SADDAM HUSSIN EXECUTION. ALL THEY WILL PROBLY NEED TO KNOW WHICH IS THE DECOY PLANE AND WHICH IS NOT.
2007-01-10 15:08:29 · 10 answers · asked by Robertus911 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Why? The country of Iraq convicted Saddam and executed him. President Bush nor America had anything to do with his trial, conviction or hanging. I'm sure you already knew that though.
2007-01-10 15:16:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Al-Qaeda hated Saddam as much as Saddam hated Al-Qaeda. Right now Osama is probably throwing a party over Saddam's death. I'm thinking if anything, Osama will call to congratulate Bush on getting rid of his enemies and weaking America by engaging in strategically unsound wars that distract America for the hunt for members of his organization.
2007-01-10 15:24:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Actually, the US did AL Qaeda(bin Laden) a HUGE favor by kicking Saddam out of power. Saddam hated Bin Laden and considered each other as bitter enemies.
Maybe for some odd reason that taking out Saddam was a gift to Bin Laden.
2007-01-10 17:07:29 · answer #3 · answered by aorton27 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Saddam has no connection with Al-Qaeda. He was clever enough to judge the consequences. He has been give a fair trial and executed. Security arrangement are minutely checked before the movement of President. Why to fear. with unknown risk.
2007-01-10 16:08:26 · answer #4 · answered by snashraf 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably not, considering the fact that in the interviews saddam said that he considered al qaeda a threat. I don't think they were really affiliated in any way.
2007-01-10 15:17:43 · answer #5 · answered by Kage Ookami 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i will not answer this question in the present day. President Obama has pronounced that he needs to proceed action in Afghanistan. yet what I really have not started to hearken to from him is a sparkling definition of what the point is, the way it will be attained, how we outline victory and what a submit-warfare coverage in Afghanistan will be. and not using a sparkling purpose, we obviously will not in any respect benefit it. to not benefit this, exposes us to the quagmire state of affairs we pronounced in Vietnam. Our forces received extraordinarily a lot each and every conflict contained in the warfare yet nonetheless lost the warfare. How is that accessible? nicely, we had no sparkling purpose. we favor 2 issues, Strategic plans and Tactical plans. The Commander-in-chief ought to arise with the Strategic plan. as quickly with the aid of the indisputable fact that's obviously defined, the protection rigidity experts can formulate Tactical plans to attain it. yet as of now, i do not understand what the Strategic plan is. for this reason, i will not say one way of the different even if that's achieveable. career isn't a Strategic plan. It purely leaves our troops uncovered and provides an enemy loads of chance to reason them damage. So, I implore President Obama to both provide a approach or withdraw the troops. *
2016-12-02 02:51:04 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea Osama will be shooting him down from his cave in Pakistan . The CIA on the other hand is a very good possibility , if Bush stops doing their bidding. Which wont happen .
2007-01-10 15:33:17 · answer #7 · answered by prole1984 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
....nah they are smarter than that, they will probably attack when American let's it's guard down like the usual.
.
2007-01-10 15:53:12 · answer #8 · answered by "RED" 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
what a dump question
what you going to do if somebody try to kill you?
2007-01-10 15:29:45 · answer #9 · answered by Arizona A 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
not a real threat
.
2007-01-10 15:54:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋