2007-01-10 14:41:11 · 11 answers · asked by hot4U 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Don't know who's running yet. remember we only get to vote on either bad choice #1 or bad choice #2 and good choice doesn't even get nominated. Of those who have already formed exploratory committees I favor Obama who seems to be doing his own thinking. For certain I don't want to see any more Bushes or Clintons in the White House I 've had enough of them. I do admire Hillary's spunk but I think she's got too much political baggage. It looks now like everyone's running so there's plenty of choices out there.
2007-01-10 15:03:00 · answer #1 · answered by pilot 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Chavez or Morales!
Lulla or Bachelet for a compromise!
Terrorism is actually something created by the USA's foreign policy throughout the last decades.
FACTS:
We, Americans are brainwashed!
God does NOT exist!
Bush is a LOOSER IN CHIEF!
Read this: it may sound sad to you, but this is the truth:
This war is lost for good anyway. The only chance to (maybe) reverse the situation would be to send 10 times more troops, at least, which is not feasible (yes, that would be about one and a half million troops!)
140,000 troops already there; add 21,500: that's 161,500.
It's similar to having 16 guys instead of 14 to do the same job: does not make a big difference, does it?
It does not even replace the 22,800 American troops who have been injured!!! Not mentioning the 3,000 who are dead and those jailed for theirs crimes...
Do you remember this Iraqi "Minister of Information" who, at the begining of the war, said the American troops would be defeated. We all laughed at him. Even him did not believe what he was saying. All we can see now is that... he was actually right!
Bush is a LOOSER IN CHIEF!
And if America does not change its foreign policy, "we will soon have car bombs here at our schools, churches and homes", as someone wrote here...
P.S.: Remember, God does NOT exist!
.
2007-01-10 14:45:53 · answer #2 · answered by s0190331 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Sam Brownback
2007-01-10 14:44:18 · answer #3 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably Third Party. No one, is capable, of running the country. Both parties are now just the Parties of Property.
2007-01-10 17:27:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Obama
2007-01-10 14:44:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Mitt Romney - at the present time
2007-01-10 22:02:24 · answer #6 · answered by sojo 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
H. Clinton!!! I think she did pretty good last time around. O be real, do you think Bill didn't get most of his advice from her? YA YA throw those thumbs down at me......but you know I'm telling the truth..*
2007-01-10 15:26:08 · answer #7 · answered by Les Gramps 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Rudolph Giuliani , we dont need anoter Clinton in office.
2007-01-10 14:47:19 · answer #8 · answered by steaua 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bill Richardson, if he does decide to run.
2007-01-10 15:15:24 · answer #9 · answered by MaybePOTUS 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Either Ubama (sp.?) or Rudolph Guliani. Ubama would be my first pick- he's so smart!
2007-01-10 14:46:42 · answer #10 · answered by Bud's Girl 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋