Statements indicating George and Marvin Bush directly ordering the destruction of the WTC will only incite ridicule from your opponents, and even people who are undecided about the 9/11 event might look at your statements at face value, and think they are worthy of derision. I understand that you mean to say that it was a broad conspiracy by the Bush administration as a whole, and his business and military partners, but many of your conservative hecklers are too literal minded to actually get the subtlety. I appreciate your endeavor to bring this issue to light, but be very careful with your terminology. Presentation is everything when you are trying to convince people, or just trying to elicit meaningful discourse.
2007-01-11 05:19:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lawrence Louis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Think - alternative thinking - take care of #1
May I suggest - Military strategy - after we had thousands of people killed on Sept. 11, 2001:
Ok, may I give you a point of view if you read between the lines:
The 20,000 troops are needed because our men and women are exhausted. They have been doing double duty, and in order to bring them home, they need support now.
Would you deny them support now?
Don't you see (maybe) that this is the way we need to bring our troops home? We must not leave those there without the help needed to keep them safe now.
When you are exhausted, don't you see how others are needed to pick up the slack, and allow our troops there a little bit of sleep and R&R? You can't just cut and run as many would be killed. This is the General's concern. So may you please understand that in order to vacate a situation, you must have someone to cover your back while you gather the tired troops and allow them to leave quietly.
Would you allow the Iraqi troops to "COVER OUR TROOPS BACKS WHILE THEY LEAVE". YEAH RIGHT! THE ONLY ONES I TRUST TO COVER OUR BACKS, ARE OUR OWN TROOPS.
That's military strategy 101 - if you ever take this in college, it's amazing. Never trust anyone other than your own troops to "have your back"!
GOD bless us one and all, always.
MBA-Boston Univ.
2007-01-10 14:40:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by May I help You? 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Oh yes more ammunition for the realists, and more to cry about for the people that think that "if you ain't republican you ain't sh*t". Because there are only 2 sides, black and white, Dem's and Rep's, god and the devil. Throw a viable third party into the mix and all hell would break loose in the U.S.
2007-01-10 14:52:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
OK
There was a point when I suspected he was a robot.
I was cool with that but it made me wonder who was in control.
Go big Red Go
2007-01-10 14:51:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES SIR! im not a 9/11 skepticist but he's the devil
2007-01-10 14:39:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
He just can't get over his fantasy of owning the middle east, can he? Pathetic!
2007-01-10 14:41:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by whrldpz 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know about you but we started a long time ago.
2007-01-10 14:42:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by taq 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't forget the video "loose change"
2007-01-10 14:41:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by shermynewstart 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
how many sheep follow you...
to the meat grinder of stupidity?
2007-01-10 14:40:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Discount that ....remove bush from office before he blows up USA.....................
2007-01-10 14:42:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by cork 7
·
1⤊
0⤋