Is that where the "war" is based? Or was that specifically to remove Saddam or to find WMD? Isn't WMD actually in Iran?
Why are there just as many if not more Islamofascists in the UK and France combined than in Iraq,
so if that's where we are going to fight a "war" what's the reasoning behind it
since Saddam didn't like the Taliban or Al qaeda and kept them out of his country?
Did all the "terrorists" from the four corners go to Iraq when Americans got there?
2007-01-10 14:35:37 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wrong... America was attacked by those headquartered in Afghanistan. How dumb it was to start a war in Iraq for no reason AND you don't know how to fight the war you should not have started.
So much for "Freedom Fries" and "traitor" and every other name that we were called for telling the ignorant leader that he was making a mistake.
2007-01-10 14:41:19 · answer #1 · answered by True Grit 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Iraq has nothing to do with the 'war on terror'. Even now there are only an estimated 4000 Al Queda members in Iraq.
2007-01-10 14:41:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Present at the day the exact vote took location, .....or NOT-----does NOT negate his lengthy status and good documented OPPOSITION to the battle, at the identical sound ideas that OTHERS who had been reward that day, stood up and truthfully voted AGAINST the battle. Obama was once good regarded facet of that camp for his vocal and protracted OPPOSITION. He can stand PROUD, with the AMERICANS, who voted AGAINST the UNPROKED use of drive towards a Sovereign country. .....and attempted to faux that a FIRST STRIKE........is quite a "justified" Pre-emptive strike......that is a load of BULLCRAP- "Pre-emptive" strike, was once a politican's phrase, to hide up an UNCONSTITUTIONAL FIRST strike. A load crap , by way of some other identify, continues to be a load of crap, and scents the identical. Bush and Cheney, must had been dragged to the Hague, proper subsequent to Saddam. But Saddam will get hanged.......and Bush and Cheney get to faux what they did was once "proper".
2016-09-03 20:13:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're right, we should have attacked saudi arabia instead.
15 of 19 hijackers, A rabs
funded by bin laden, A rab
seems like we were attacked by A rab's.
2007-01-10 14:44:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Could you give me the names of these accused liberals as you refer to them? No one has heard such ignorance but you apparently. Get a clue.
2007-01-10 14:42:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋