He's already deployed troops as of Monday, the surge didn't need a vote. Sorry people, you've been duped. He's using the same hood that Saddam refused, he's using to put over all americans heads so that they "see no evil".
2007-01-10 14:29:11 · 8 answers · asked by whispergently0204 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Right! And by the time Congress tries to step in, it's too late!
2007-01-10 14:35:56 · answer #1 · answered by shermynewstart 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We, Americans are brainwashed!
And God does NOT exist!
Read this: it may sound sad to you, but this is the truth:
This war is lost for good anyway. The only chance to (maybe) reverse the situation would be to send 10 times more troops, at least, which is not feasible (yes, that would be about one and a half million troops!)
140,000 troops already there; add 21,500: that's 161,500.
It's similar to having 16 guys instead of 14 to do the same job: does not make a big difference, does it?
It does not even replace the 22,800 American troops who have been injured!!! Not mentioning the 3,000 who are dead and those jailed for theirs crimes...
Do you remember this Iraqi "Minister of Information" who, at the begining of the war, said the American troops would be defeated. We all laughed at him. Even him did not believe what he was saying. All we can see now is that... he was actually right!
Bush is a LOOSER IN CHIEF!
And if America does not change its foreign policy, "we will soon have car bombs here at our schools, churches and homes", as someone wrote here...
P.S.: Remember, God does NOT exist!
.
2007-01-10 22:34:10 · answer #2 · answered by s0190331 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The term "dupe" is usually used to differentiate between a "dupe" of the Third Comintern, as opposed to an "operative" of the Third Comintern.
The US Constitution does not designate socialist or Islamo-fascist operatives or dupes to be the Commander in Chief of the US armed forces, especially at a time of war. Like everything else in the Constitution, there are very good reasons.
And surrender monkeys and useful idiots comprise one of such reasons.
2007-01-10 22:39:45 · answer #3 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are retated. That is why he is a republican, we vote him i and he is free to make many decisions in time of war. You do know he is the commander in chief right? And please don't compare him to a ruthless terrorist, has he hurt you yet, have you been sent to a concentration camp or have you had acid poured on your body? What do you think he is going to do, take the world over? That is impossible and stupid, maybe you just can't see any good in getting rid of terrorism.
2007-01-10 22:36:14 · answer #4 · answered by E-Street Band 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You didn't have a saY in the matter to begin with. Stick to video games and leave protecting civilizations to the adults.
2007-01-10 22:33:40 · answer #5 · answered by Shaddup Libs 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yet another liberal who thinks he's smarter than everyone else but is too stupid to even parallel park, let alone discuss foreign policy. Yahoo questions is for QUESTIONS! It is not your soapbox to preach!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-01-10 22:34:38 · answer #6 · answered by vabraces 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wrong, he is just doing his job
2007-01-10 22:34:12 · answer #7 · answered by goodtimesgladly 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, god love his heart
2007-01-10 22:35:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋