Yes! They impeached Clinton for a BJ & the economy was the best it's ever been in my lifetime!
2007-01-10 14:32:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by shermynewstart 7
·
6⤊
6⤋
Nope & now think about this!
Ok, may I give you a point of view if you read between the lines:
The 20,000 troops are needed because our men and women are exhausted. They have been doing double duty, and in order to bring them home, they need support now.
Would you deny them support now?
Don't you see (maybe) that this is the way we need to bring our troops home? We must not leave those there without the help needed to keep them safe now.
When you are exhausted, don't you see how others are needed to pick up the slack, and allow our troops there a little bit of sleep and R&R? You can't just cut and run as many would be killed. This is the General's concern. So may you please understand that in order to vacate a situation, you must have someone to cover your back while you gather the tired troops and allow them to leave quietly.
Would you allow the Iraqi troops to "COVER OUR TROOPS BACKS WHILE THEY LEAVE". YEAH RIGHT! THE ONLY ONES I TRUST TO COVER OUR BACKS, ARE OUR OWN TROOPS.
That's military strategy 101 - if you ever take this in college, it's amazing. Never trust anyone other than your own troops to "have your back"!
GOD bless us one and all, always.
MBA-Boston Uiv.
2007-01-10 22:30:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by May I help You? 6
·
8⤊
1⤋
No, the impeachment, was made for illegal acts, and despite all of your hate you cannot prove that he has done anything illegal, because he hasnt, and if he has it was too small of a thing for impeachment, it was meant to be a difficult thing, so that hasty opinions could not change the direction of the government at a whim, like you wish it to be, remember your opionions form the very minority of American views, or at least try to understand that.
2007-01-10 22:38:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by asmith1022_2006 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
no, i'm not supporting impeachment now.
and i won't unless our borders get much worse very fast.
ETA: quote: And if America does not change its foreign policy, "we will soon have car bombs here at our schools, churches and homes", as someone wrote here...
so we appeased terrorists since carter was in office, and what did it get us? 9-11. you suggest appeasing them more after that? the only way to get these ppl to leave us alone is to show them they can't sway us, they can't frighten us into giving in, and that we will NOT submit.
this country needs to wake up and quit pretending we're not in a fight for our lives here.
2007-01-10 23:21:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by political junkie 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Impeachment will never happen. The Constitution does NOT exist to the Republican Party unless if we have a Democrat Prez. Corruption, corruption, corruption. The new constitution to these tightwads is called "The Holy Bible".
"Thou Shall not Lie"
"Thou Shall not kill"
Both of which the BUSH administration has done. oh boy
more like.......
"Thou shall support the war or else.........."
2007-01-10 22:39:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by EddieRasco 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Ive supported Impeaching Bush way back into his 1st term in office No matter that he has only 2 yrs left, Clinton was impeached for getting a B.J. with just about the same amount of time left in 0ffice by a Republican congress. What Bush has been doing is10,00 times worse The man ( I use the term loosely) has ignored the laws and constitution of this nation. He should not be allowed to get away with it.
2007-01-10 22:30:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by bisquedog 6
·
3⤊
8⤋
Nope
2007-01-10 22:33:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by patrioticpeladac 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Yes
2007-01-10 22:33:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by michelle a 4
·
5⤊
3⤋
No. As long as there is freedom in America there will be traitors and cowards, but I don't think there are enough to actually succeed at impeachment right now.
2007-01-10 22:36:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by shirleykins 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
Impeachment would just add more problems, and the last thing America needs is more problems
2007-01-10 22:34:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by a person 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
And, he's stomped all over the constitution while doing so!
So yes, he deserves an impeaching. But I don't think he'll get it.
2007-01-10 22:38:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by Stardust 6
·
3⤊
4⤋