The Corvette's LS1 engine was more powerful than the one that came in the 2000 WS6.
The WS6 LS1 had a milder cam and the intake and exhaust manifolds were slightly more restrictive than the Corvette's LS1 engine.
WS6 HP: 320hp
Vette HP: 345hp
2007-01-11 03:49:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by MarkP 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's the same motor. The hp difference is mainly from exhaust. Look at the replacement crate ls1 motor- same motor for both cars but with a higher hp rating than any of the ls1 cars.
And I second the "Dur" and add a "What a moron!"
2007-01-11 02:05:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Derek 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, being the biggest F-Body fan and all, I would think that the Vette Motor has a different timing, carb, and all kinds of better things that the standard trans am doesn't. The Vette has always beat the trans am stock so yeah, I would prefer the vette motor any day!!!
2007-01-10 14:20:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by butanebird91 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
its basically the same motor... but with a few things different.
and to the moron who is "the biggest f-body fan" 2000 era vettes arent carbureted duuurrrrrrr!!!!!
2007-01-10 22:02:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by k_dizzle_09 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is the same engine. run the Numbers it is most likely the original.
2007-01-10 14:20:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jason W 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
348ci. same revs, same internals. Just different gearing and weight and body designs.
2007-01-10 14:34:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by OwinC 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is the same engine
2007-01-10 14:16:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by vw tech 3
·
0⤊
0⤋