It's amazing how easily brainwashed people are when they actually think they can
"Win" a war on 'terror' or 'drugs', it's akin to saying you can "win" a war on premarital sex.
And there are just as many if not more Islamofascists in the UK and France as there is in Iran or Iraq, so why don't we force our buddy Blair to give up all the hoards of Taliban sympathisers in his nation chanting "death to America" and "kill Bush" in the streets of London under their government's protection?
Many terrorists are actually UK nationals, wouldn't it make more sense to force Bush's pet Blair to force his terrorist sympathiser Muslims into exile?
2007-01-10
13:56:07
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
But Benny, I don't EVER watch TV news.
So where does your argument have to go now?
2007-01-10
14:08:51 ·
update #1
Well, we all know terrorism is real, 9/11 would be my case in point (not to mention the countless beheadings, embassy bombings, USS cole, Madrid, London subways, carbombings, shoe bombers...so on and so forth)
So terrorism being real, we have two options. Fight it or tolerate it. Tolerance got us 9/11. I would say war is the only reasonable option. If that makes me brainwashed, so be it
2007-01-10 14:00:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
in short. Its only a premise for an agenda to allow governments to have more desirable get entry to to information with reference to the broader public. They really opt for to attraction to close what each and every man or woman is questioning previously they imagine it and the "conflict on terror" provides governments a procedures more desirable potential to seek peoples files and delve deeper into peoples own lives with the intention to locate sneakier procedures of controlling what and how the regular public thinks, acts, reads, beverages, eats etc etc. i lately made a purchase order on ebay for an merchandise I under no circumstances recieved. the object became over $one thousand yet paypal wouldnt relaese the $one thousand+ until eventually I provided my passport huge form and modern-day handle. Eventhough Ive been coping with paypal for years with an same economic corporation account they needed me to substantiate my identity. All because of anti terrorist funding regulations imposed through the U. S. authorities. Anti-terrorist funding were the words they used!! really i became an apprehension suspect until eventually i might want to tutor in the different case. genuinely sickening in case you question me. ok! Now I see why you cant see the interrelation. you're of route quite e book sensible regardless of the indisputable fact that the remark about human beings will give up utilising drugs at the same time as its now not a fashion to insurrection really shows your false impression of the question you posed as well as your age. Im guessing your not even 18 yet. supply it time youthful padwan and dont bury your head interior the sand to guard your e book/newspaper/ GOOGLE/television beliefs. And undergo in concepts a perception is only a inflexible opinion with little room for authentic perception.
2016-10-17 00:46:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Blair is no puppet of Bush, they just see eye to eye about these issues, thank god we have an ally like him. The whole deporting muslims thing is impossible, fighting to curb terrorism is an attainable goal, and a war that should be fought, whether we can win or not, it doesnt matter if you win, it just matters that you fought.
2007-01-10 14:49:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by asmith1022_2006 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe we could try and fight terrorism by trying to determine what the source of it is and examine what we may or may not have done that could have contributed to all the discord?
Maybe if we stopped propping up dictators and manipulating politics in certain parts of the world people might not want to attack us?
Just a thought.
But, no, I'm sure they "hate us for our freedom"
Yeah. That makes MUCH more sense. Couldn't be anything else. People want to fly planes into our office towers because we let women drive cars and wear makeup. Yeah. Thats it. LOL
2007-01-10 14:06:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Blair or anyone else probably does not have much control over the radicals. I hear they've even established 'sharia law' there. (the cutting off of hands,feet,heads for punishment)This is the plan for all nations but to be completely taken over.
2007-01-10 14:03:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by spareo1 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No the title describes the action. "brainwashed" is denying the fact that terrorists are a threat. 9/11 was very real, and they brought the fight to us.
2007-01-10 14:00:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's actually amazing what the news media actually broadcasts. Just keep in mind that everything you hear on the news is not necessarily the truth.
2007-01-10 14:02:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by cajunrescuemedic 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Brainwashed? Yeah. After reading your rant I would say you are very experienced in being brainwashed. Adjust your tin hat.
2007-01-10 14:01:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Stop using illegal drugs and your perspective on life will change.
We all have to grow up sometime.
2007-01-10 14:07:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by ally_oop_64 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
and...cloe would be the first to scream..why were we not protected, if there is another attack....liberal weenies...what a yuk!!!!!
2007-01-10 14:09:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by bushfan88 5
·
0⤊
0⤋