2007-01-10 13:49:09 · 7 answers · asked by dtshaff 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Actually I always thought there was a screening process that prevented bad movies from being released. Failed movies would go straight to video.
That's what I believed until 'From Justin to Kelly' was released.
2007-01-10 13:59:05 · update #1
And free enterprise gives people the right to make bad movies.
2007-01-10 14:09:22 · answer #1 · answered by MaryAn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nobody can see the big picture of how a movie is "bad" until it has flopped at the box office and been panned by major critics. It comes as a surprise and unless people are very careful mistakes are easy to make!
2007-01-10 13:55:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you define as a bad movie may be a great movie to someone else, so a screening process would be unfair.
2007-01-10 13:54:00 · answer #3 · answered by sheep.crazy 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They figured that they lost so much money making the movie, they have nothing to loose. Their hoping to get back any buck they can.
2007-01-10 13:58:02 · answer #4 · answered by Mariposa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what a stupid question...not everyone hates the same movie. For instance, I think Torque is the worst movie ever made, but I'm sure somewhere out there someone liked it
2007-01-10 13:53:40 · answer #5 · answered by duvalicious 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
oh torque might be bad... but far from the worst.. Miami Vice is the worst.
2007-01-10 13:54:53 · answer #6 · answered by clomtancy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because 'bad' is entirely objective. That would be impossible.
2007-01-10 13:52:42 · answer #7 · answered by Kayden 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋