2007-01-10 13:36:22 · 7 answers · asked by adam b 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no
2007-01-10 13:39:37 · answer #1 · answered by amatullah 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What the hell took him so long before speaking to the nation, when there is nothing new in his speech?. He was supposed to speak to the nation during the third week of December, but then postponed it to be after the new year, with the excuse that he needed enough time to carefullty study the Iraq Study Group's recommendations?. And yet tonight his speech contained nothing new, except for additional 20,000 more troops?. Is that what he call new strategy on Iraq?.
2007-01-11 02:20:29 · answer #2 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not in the least. I just checked at MSNBC.com - their poll with over 19,000 responses - 69% against. At least I'm not in the minority.
And am I the only one who gets the idea Bush is waving a red flag in front of two bulls - Iran and Syria? How long before we wind up fighting them as well? The man seems kill-crazy and wants to spread the war throughout the entire Middle East not just confine it to Iraq. Let's hope Congress reins him in.
2007-01-10 21:43:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do because I support George W. Bush, always Have and Always Will.
2007-01-10 21:40:02 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, not really.
But time will tell if this is going to work or not. It really isn't as if this is anything we haven't tried before.
I found it interesting how he portrayed it as if more troops was a new idea somehow.
2007-01-10 21:43:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't even watch it and i already KNOW i don't support it. everything that comes out of that mans mouth is crap and lies...
2007-01-10 21:41:24 · answer #6 · answered by Brittany A 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no way
2007-01-10 21:40:45 · answer #7 · answered by chris b 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋