Why was he hanged for the 148 people that he killed in Dujail? But what about thousands of Kurds that he used chemical weapons on? What about the Iran-Iraq war crimes and Gulf War crimes? Why is there a rush in hanging him before the other charges being said?
Answer: The Dujail incident is the only incident that the U.S did not involved. As for the rest of the crime, US is directly or indirectly involved, in other means, the U.S President at that time (Ronald Reagan) should be hanged to death too.
2007-01-10 13:14:56 · 7 answers · asked by movexz 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeah, except Reagan is already dead.
They dropped the charges on Saddam's crimes against the Kurds a couple days ago. I guess they figure if you're dead, you can't stand trial.
2007-01-10 13:21:13 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Malaprop 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree there was a rush to hang Saddam. I find it silly to be quite honest that they wanted him dead for this crime and not the "real" crime against humanity. In effect all he was really doing was cracking down on assasins, if anything they should have waited for the trial that really mattered. The part thats even better is his underlings got a stay on their execution... Probably the worst part about hurrying this thing was it got all botched up, the Sunni's took it as a lynching, now he's a martyr and the situation is almost worse than it was before. They should have run he situation a whole lot differently.
As for the 150000 ish Kurds... what more you wanna do to the guy ? hes dead.
2007-01-12 01:03:19 · answer #2 · answered by Dylan m 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Silly question since you answered it already with your own selfish thoughts & views...dontcha think?? Anyways...Saddam was a tyrant and a brutal leader.....they probably executed him quickly before some of his followers attempted to rescue him...who cares..the POS is dead now...they could take his body and throw it to the vultures or to the sharks in the Black Sea....Ronny Reagan was a good American Pres. who did many Great things for the entire World.....the worst thing he did was act with a chimp!!!
2007-01-10 13:30:24 · answer #3 · answered by fxbeto 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes go ahead, hang Ronald Reagan, You'll look stupid hanging a dead guy.
BTW: whats the point of answering your own question?
2007-01-10 13:19:50 · answer #4 · answered by a person 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Reagan is dead already, even if we did hang him , what kind of message would that send to the world,?we enjoy killing our leaders like some banana republic?
2007-01-10 13:19:45 · answer #5 · answered by Edward 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
observing the somewhat some previous solutions jogs my memory that people who shout loudest have the least to declare and the main to conceal. The Iraqis that Saddam killed have been oftentimes killed with the conivance and appoval of england and usa, no longer that Britain has had an self sufficient voice for years, and we killed many with the sanctions we imposed on Iraq, which the politicians knew and probable was hoping may be the case, so as that they could portray what have been their murderous tyrant as now an self sufficient murderous tyrant. attempt looking in the back of the headlines, a number of you.
2016-11-28 03:08:05 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea, I'm all for digging them all up and hanging them again...... LOL
2007-01-10 13:21:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋