English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm sorry something smells bad and sounds so fishy?, I'm speaking from my experience and what my heart tells, it seems like a big set up for the U.S. government take control of the Middle East, why not, he's got Israel in the news this week claiming they had nuclear weapons and were testing them to drop on a specific location in Iran, why all the media hype, to cover what was really happening, Mr. Bush has already sent his troops without nobody's approval, hey, what can I say, he's put the hood on all americans.

2007-01-10 13:13:43 · 4 answers · asked by whispergently0204 3 in News & Events Current Events

sry about the hood comment didn't mean to be disrespectful but it truly in my heart put into reality and understanding of "Why did Saddam refused the hood"?

2007-01-10 13:16:33 · update #1

I hear what you are saying pplz 1st, my heart goes out to you, I'm sorry that the war at home wasn't settled before they ventured into regions forbidden and unwanted. Katrina suffered, they deserved only 1 billion out of the 110 billion they spent on the war, now they'll take from the mouths of babes, to feed their egotistical goals.

2007-01-10 13:59:06 · update #2

4 answers

That appears to be so. Seem to recall something about re-mapping the Middle East.

If he does get total control, how is he going to make use of it?

The next President could likely be a Democrat.

The American people may be hoodwinked once, even twice. But never a third time. Or could they?

2007-01-10 18:14:40 · answer #1 · answered by adsar 2 · 0 0

i think he just wants as many people killed as he can possibly manage here or there doesn't matter i think a dozen knives to the face firing- squad would be too good for him. but first he and Arnold should have their heads knocked together as Mr. Arnold is taking away 1/2 a billion dollars from the already poor starving children on welfare as of today. That is future murders in the making.

2007-01-10 13:36:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Some day in history this whole Bush saga with Saddam, weapons of mass destruction, thousands of deaths in vain and Americans willing to go along with it... will equate to the mental rule used by Hitler.
No one protests anymore.
Think of the 60's and 70's; huge war protests by Americans....and they were heard. The war stopped.

2007-01-10 13:24:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

point assaults?? Please tell me you're no longer as stupid as your question makes you look. Did they point the assaults of the 1st commerce center bombings in 'ninety 3? Did they point the assaults on 2 of our embassies in Africa, or on the united statesCole?? Did they point the assaults on the trains in Madrid, or the buses in London, or the Disco in Bali?? Did they point the terrorist attack on the college in Russia? Terrorism from the middle east has been around because of the fact the '60's. an prolonged time previously Bush and Cheney have been in potential. Get a clue!!

2016-11-28 03:08:02 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers