English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't consider that very high at all.......have I just reread history wrong or have we not lost many many more good men to previous wars at a much quicker rate? Seems like a small price to pay to keep our nation safe from terrorists. Its high time the world starting taking control back from terrorist groups that have long held the innocent hostage to their terror.

2007-01-10 11:34:04 · 2 answers · asked by WitchTwo 6 in Politics & Government Government

You are entitled to your opinion as am I Ryan....we didn't think it was worth it in WWII until we were forced into it....we were forced into on 9/11.

2007-01-12 13:28:26 · update #1

2 answers

Hey 3000 in Iraq; about 25,000 CASUALTIES. Go look up the definition. Thats an entire city of people coming home wounded. Not to mention the high number of post traumatic stress syndrome and other mental afflications a brutal civil war. We lost 100's of thousands in WWII and nobody was complaining. We've lost 100's in Afghanistan and we aren't complaining about that. Not that we're insensitive but we know those losses are necessary. People questioning whether these soldiers are giving their lives in the name of a commander in chief who refuses to recognize that we cannot with this war in iraq by siimply throwing troops and money, that a political solution must be worked out among iraqis not by american blood. you have no idea what youre talking about and it shows. 25000 men and women is too high a price to pay for a strategy that isn't working

2007-01-10 12:31:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ever detect, traditionally, the man with the most important guns kills essentially the most? Did you consider "surprise and awe" selectively landed best on empty structures without a collateral harm? War on Terror? Not if in case you have a border so porous young adults can stroll via it with no boo being stated to them. Until we take a few movements that actively safeguard us as a substitute of retroactive 'scanners' I'm going out on a limb right here and announcing Bush is waving a huge flag and its time we discovered what hes doing at the back of his again, I have a sense, that like establishing our mail, hes been very, very unhealthy. As to the top honchos realizing "matters we do not recognize" might be at one time they might do this, however the Internet has bunches of yappers and the percentages of something that is honestly occurred staying mystery are more and more lengthy. Not all wars have an identical quantity of losses, if you're fortunate, its your aspect that sustains the least, however a minimum of I can realise why the Iraqis don't seem to be too keen on us both.

2016-09-03 20:06:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers